Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 91.
45. lappuse
... matters of public importance and therefore does not deserve a forum.82 Thus , corporate image adver- tising which does address a matter of public importance would apparently deserve protection , regardless of any accompanying commercial ...
... matters of public importance and therefore does not deserve a forum.82 Thus , corporate image adver- tising which does address a matter of public importance would apparently deserve protection , regardless of any accompanying commercial ...
134. lappuse
... matter in which the person communicating has an interest is qualifiably privileged , where made to a person having a corre- sponding subject matter interest . In order to lose the privilege , the Plaintiff must show that the ...
... matter in which the person communicating has an interest is qualifiably privileged , where made to a person having a corre- sponding subject matter interest . In order to lose the privilege , the Plaintiff must show that the ...
310. lappuse
... matter of a proposed patent within one or more of the statutory categories a patent application will be properly denied . For example , mental processes and methods of doing business , have been held not to be the proper subject matter ...
... matter of a proposed patent within one or more of the statutory categories a patent application will be properly denied . For example , mental processes and methods of doing business , have been held not to be the proper subject matter ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation