Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 32.
137. lappuse
... mark CARROM and agreed for the period of three years not to use that word in a more prominent manner than the use on the date of the agreement . Further , they could not expand the use of that word during the three year period ...
... mark CARROM and agreed for the period of three years not to use that word in a more prominent manner than the use on the date of the agreement . Further , they could not expand the use of that word during the three year period ...
321. lappuse
... mark throughout the country . After five years of use and federal registration , the registration becomes prima facie evidence of the registrant's exclusive right to use the mark.88 The implications of federal registration for a small ...
... mark throughout the country . After five years of use and federal registration , the registration becomes prima facie evidence of the registrant's exclusive right to use the mark.88 The implications of federal registration for a small ...
365. lappuse
... Mark " is a less specific term than " trademark . " It is defined to include sym- bols - such as trademarks , service marks , collective marks , or certification marks - which are entitled to registration whether or not actually ...
... Mark " is a less specific term than " trademark . " It is defined to include sym- bols - such as trademarks , service marks , collective marks , or certification marks - which are entitled to registration whether or not actually ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation