Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 84.
287. lappuse
... held , restricted to California proceedings . As to the Constitutional objection ; the argument , they noted , was one that the Supreme Court had laid to rest in Branzberg v Hayes ( 408 U.S. 665 ) . There it was held that the First ...
... held , restricted to California proceedings . As to the Constitutional objection ; the argument , they noted , was one that the Supreme Court had laid to rest in Branzberg v Hayes ( 408 U.S. 665 ) . There it was held that the First ...
402. lappuse
... held that there could be no Summary Judgment on the issue of privilege . They stated that if it were to fall within the privileged area , the Defendant must show that the communication was reasonably restricted and that it was made in ...
... held that there could be no Summary Judgment on the issue of privilege . They stated that if it were to fall within the privileged area , the Defendant must show that the communication was reasonably restricted and that it was made in ...
477. lappuse
... held protected by the first amendment . " Even pre- viously , advertisements for religious meetings , religious ... held in violation of freedom of press and speech ) . 73. Jamison v . Texas , 318 U.S. 413 , 416 ( 1943 ) ( handbills ...
... held protected by the first amendment . " Even pre- viously , advertisements for religious meetings , religious ... held in violation of freedom of press and speech ) . 73. Jamison v . Texas , 318 U.S. 413 , 416 ( 1943 ) ( handbills ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation