Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 64.
224. lappuse
... Fairness Doctrine in Broadcasting The procedure through which the FCC administers the fairness doctrine is carefully designed to avoid inhibition of broadcasters ' presentation of public issues . " Broadcasters are not required to ...
... Fairness Doctrine in Broadcasting The procedure through which the FCC administers the fairness doctrine is carefully designed to avoid inhibition of broadcasters ' presentation of public issues . " Broadcasters are not required to ...
228. lappuse
... fairness doctrine applies to editorial comment in advertise- ments but does not apply to false or deceptive advertising.107 In Banzhaf v . FCC , 108 the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Ap- peals upheld the FCC's application of the ...
... fairness doctrine applies to editorial comment in advertise- ments but does not apply to false or deceptive advertising.107 In Banzhaf v . FCC , 108 the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Ap- peals upheld the FCC's application of the ...
229. lappuse
... fairness doctrine the FCC concluded that ciga- rette advertising was a special health case and that the fairness doctrine should not otherwise hereafter apply to product advertis- ing . However , if a broadcaster accepts a product ...
... fairness doctrine the FCC concluded that ciga- rette advertising was a special health case and that the fairness doctrine should not otherwise hereafter apply to product advertis- ing . However , if a broadcaster accepts a product ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation