Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 84.
44. lappuse
... fact that the advertiser bears the expense of being heard . A monetary interest alone , however , does not warrant first amendment protection ; cases such as New York Times indicate some of the nonmonetary interests that might be ...
... fact that the advertiser bears the expense of being heard . A monetary interest alone , however , does not warrant first amendment protection ; cases such as New York Times indicate some of the nonmonetary interests that might be ...
131. lappuse
... fact in connection with the National Cir- culation figures of " Penthouse " . The Court noted that the mistake was unintentional and that a good faith effort was made to correct it . They stated that the requirements for Preliminary ...
... fact in connection with the National Cir- culation figures of " Penthouse " . The Court noted that the mistake was unintentional and that a good faith effort was made to correct it . They stated that the requirements for Preliminary ...
226. lappuse
... fact and law context . Professor Kenneth Davis has pointed out the difficulty in extracting the criteria which motivate the reviewing court , on the one hand , to classify a mixed law and fact context as one of fact and thus to apply ...
... fact and law context . Professor Kenneth Davis has pointed out the difficulty in extracting the criteria which motivate the reviewing court , on the one hand , to classify a mixed law and fact context as one of fact and thus to apply ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation