Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 60.
443. lappuse
... copy of the maquette , as being a " nere copy , albeit on a grand scale , of the maquette , a work already in the public domain . " Letter Edged in Black Press v . Pub . Bldg Com'n of Chicago , 320 F. Supp . 1303 ( N.D. Ill . 1970 ) ...
... copy of the maquette , as being a " nere copy , albeit on a grand scale , of the maquette , a work already in the public domain . " Letter Edged in Black Press v . Pub . Bldg Com'n of Chicago , 320 F. Supp . 1303 ( N.D. Ill . 1970 ) ...
444. lappuse
... copy of a copy , being twice re- moved from the original , will not compare favorably in quality to a reproduction made directly from an original . For this rea- son , such second generation reproductions may not be commer- cially ...
... copy of a copy , being twice re- moved from the original , will not compare favorably in quality to a reproduction made directly from an original . For this rea- son , such second generation reproductions may not be commer- cially ...
449. lappuse
... copy . However , such a promise may not effectively bind third - party purchasers of the copy . Therefore , the effect of the Werckmeister rule , if interpreted as requiring actively enforced restrictions on copying in order to preserve ...
... copy . However , such a promise may not effectively bind third - party purchasers of the copy . Therefore , the effect of the Werckmeister rule , if interpreted as requiring actively enforced restrictions on copying in order to preserve ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation