Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 67.
6. lappuse
... charged to have been made by the County Prosecutor and news clippings quoting these statements were introduced in trial . Plaintiff charged defamation ( among other charges ) and the question of Prosecutor's immunity was raised . The ...
... charged to have been made by the County Prosecutor and news clippings quoting these statements were introduced in trial . Plaintiff charged defamation ( among other charges ) and the question of Prosecutor's immunity was raised . The ...
135. lappuse
... charged with violation of the Statute . He claimed that such action violated his rights under the First , Fifth , and Fourteenth Amendments . On appeal , it was charged that the Trial Court erred in not properly instructing the jury of ...
... charged with violation of the Statute . He claimed that such action violated his rights under the First , Fifth , and Fourteenth Amendments . On appeal , it was charged that the Trial Court erred in not properly instructing the jury of ...
154. lappuse
... charged that they have misrepresented the nature and value of the services , and have failed to disclose material facts to clients . The Commission charged that the firm misrepresented that it is qualified or recog- nized to process ...
... charged that they have misrepresented the nature and value of the services , and have failed to disclose material facts to clients . The Commission charged that the firm misrepresented that it is qualified or recog- nized to process ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation