Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 30.
251. lappuse
... authority asserted by the Commission in 1966 and generally sustained by this Court in Southwestern was authority to regulate CATV with a view not merely to 199. 47 C.F.R. § 76.31 ( 1973 ) . 200. In order to attract investment capital ...
... authority asserted by the Commission in 1966 and generally sustained by this Court in Southwestern was authority to regulate CATV with a view not merely to 199. 47 C.F.R. § 76.31 ( 1973 ) . 200. In order to attract investment capital ...
252. lappuse
... authority to require cable operators to originate programming . Id . at 677. Four other justices concluded that the FCC had such authority . Id . at 667 , 669. Chief Justice Burger's opinion concurring with the latter four is marinated ...
... authority to require cable operators to originate programming . Id . at 677. Four other justices concluded that the FCC had such authority . Id . at 667 , 669. Chief Justice Burger's opinion concurring with the latter four is marinated ...
458. lappuse
... authority from two sources : the Copyright Act " and the Administrative Procedure Act.92 The Copyright Act con- tains a broad grant of authority : " . . [ T ] he Register of Copy- rights shall be authorized to make rules and regulations ...
... authority from two sources : the Copyright Act " and the Administrative Procedure Act.92 The Copyright Act con- tains a broad grant of authority : " . . [ T ] he Register of Copy- rights shall be authorized to make rules and regulations ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation