Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 35.
437. lappuse
... artist holding a valid copyright will not be protected from the possibility of another artist's independent creation and sale of a substantially similar work . As a practical matter , an artist alleging copyright infringe- ment can make ...
... artist holding a valid copyright will not be protected from the possibility of another artist's independent creation and sale of a substantially similar work . As a practical matter , an artist alleging copyright infringe- ment can make ...
445. lappuse
... artist upon subsequent resale of his work . However , such contracts between an artist and a purchaser of his work , like contracts between the artist and viewers of his work , may be difficult to enforce when sought to be applied to ...
... artist upon subsequent resale of his work . However , such contracts between an artist and a purchaser of his work , like contracts between the artist and viewers of his work , may be difficult to enforce when sought to be applied to ...
451. lappuse
... artist of copyright at this point will fail to advance the economic security of artists . If the proper point for terminating an artist's perpetual common law rights in his work is the point at which the artist obtains sub- stantial ...
... artist of copyright at this point will fail to advance the economic security of artists . If the proper point for terminating an artist's perpetual common law rights in his work is the point at which the artist obtains sub- stantial ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation