Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 87.
37. lappuse
... advertising is the subject of some disagreement , even among advertisers them- selves , " there is no indication that it is being abandoned . On the contrary , the increasing reliance on corporate image advertising is perhaps the ...
... advertising is the subject of some disagreement , even among advertisers them- selves , " there is no indication that it is being abandoned . On the contrary , the increasing reliance on corporate image advertising is perhaps the ...
45. lappuse
... advertising , but only in the context of product advertising , not corporate image advertis- ing . The first of these justifications is that false advertising , unlike erroneous ideas , does not address matters of public importance and ...
... advertising , but only in the context of product advertising , not corporate image advertis- ing . The first of these justifications is that false advertising , unlike erroneous ideas , does not address matters of public importance and ...
61. lappuse
Finally , the FTC has proposed counter - advertising to offset ef- fect of advertising . Counter - advertising invokes the " fairness doc- trine " of the Federal Communications Commission ( FCC ) , which requires that the broadcast ...
Finally , the FTC has proposed counter - advertising to offset ef- fect of advertising . Counter - advertising invokes the " fairness doc- trine " of the Federal Communications Commission ( FCC ) , which requires that the broadcast ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation