Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 56.
471. lappuse
... activity with which it is associated . " A second ra- tionale would hold commercial speech outside the first amend- ment because the speech itself does not communicate ideas which the first amendment was designed to protect . " In ...
... activity with which it is associated . " A second ra- tionale would hold commercial speech outside the first amend- ment because the speech itself does not communicate ideas which the first amendment was designed to protect . " In ...
473. lappuse
... activity of discrim- inatory employment which could be prohibited . If the commercial idea / activity distinction is accepted , then the court must decide whether the advertisement so integrates the idea with the activity that the state ...
... activity of discrim- inatory employment which could be prohibited . If the commercial idea / activity distinction is accepted , then the court must decide whether the advertisement so integrates the idea with the activity that the state ...
479. lappuse
... activity . Where statutes are designed to regulate activity but inciden- tally infringe on first amendment rights , the Supreme Court has adopted a " least restrictive alternative " test . " The purpose of this test is to ensure that ...
... activity . Where statutes are designed to regulate activity but inciden- tally infringe on first amendment rights , the Supreme Court has adopted a " least restrictive alternative " test . " The purpose of this test is to ensure that ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation