Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 66.
37. lappuse
... York , 221 U.S. 467 ( 1911 ) . While Chrestensen dealt strictly with the mode of dissemination , the doctrine has been extended to permit the regulation of advertising content as well . E.F. Drewl & Co. v . FTC , 235 F.2d 735 , 739 ( 2d ...
... York , 221 U.S. 467 ( 1911 ) . While Chrestensen dealt strictly with the mode of dissemination , the doctrine has been extended to permit the regulation of advertising content as well . E.F. Drewl & Co. v . FTC , 235 F.2d 735 , 739 ( 2d ...
44. lappuse
... York Times indicate some of the nonmonetary interests that might be sufficient to in- voke such protection.74 To the advertiser's interest should be added the community's interest in hearing all sides of important public questions.75 ...
... York Times indicate some of the nonmonetary interests that might be sufficient to in- voke such protection.74 To the advertiser's interest should be added the community's interest in hearing all sides of important public questions.75 ...
68. lappuse
... York Times v . Sullivan , 34 the Court ruled that in certain kinds of privacy suits , plaintiffs must prove mal- ice and a very special kind of malice , as discussed in the next 28. See discussion in Part VI infra . 29. Prosser , supra ...
... York Times v . Sullivan , 34 the Court ruled that in certain kinds of privacy suits , plaintiffs must prove mal- ice and a very special kind of malice , as discussed in the next 28. See discussion in Part VI infra . 29. Prosser , supra ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation