Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 82.
5. lappuse
... Defendant . He was a co - pilot assigned to fly a Du Pont co - owned airplane . The flight resulted in a crash landing with significant property damage and Plaintiff was removed from Du Pont flight operations . Later , the Defendant ...
... Defendant . He was a co - pilot assigned to fly a Du Pont co - owned airplane . The flight resulted in a crash landing with significant property damage and Plaintiff was removed from Du Pont flight operations . Later , the Defendant ...
6. lappuse
... Defendant newspaper ran an article describing the situation . Five months after the publi- cation of the questioned article the Plaintiff notified the Defendant that a libel suit was being initiated . The letter specified the article ...
... Defendant newspaper ran an article describing the situation . Five months after the publi- cation of the questioned article the Plaintiff notified the Defendant that a libel suit was being initiated . The letter specified the article ...
328. lappuse
... Defendant appropriated Lahr's unique vocal creation for the voice of a duck in defendant's commercial . The trial court's dismissal of Lahr's suit was reversed by the appellate court on grounds of defamation , holding " that an ...
... Defendant appropriated Lahr's unique vocal creation for the voice of a duck in defendant's commercial . The trial court's dismissal of Lahr's suit was reversed by the appellate court on grounds of defamation , holding " that an ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation