Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 90.
166. lappuse
... Commission demurred.36 Swept along , though , was an added complication - the statement of Program- ming Policy issued by the Yale Broadcasting Company and sub- mitted to the Commission for its consideration . The Commission refused to ...
... Commission demurred.36 Swept along , though , was an added complication - the statement of Program- ming Policy issued by the Yale Broadcasting Company and sub- mitted to the Commission for its consideration . The Commission refused to ...
419. lappuse
... Commission had charged that the company was in violation of a 1968 order prohibiting inducement or knowing receipt of discriminatory promotional consideration . The suit had charged that the retailer received such allowances through six ...
... Commission had charged that the company was in violation of a 1968 order prohibiting inducement or knowing receipt of discriminatory promotional consideration . The suit had charged that the retailer received such allowances through six ...
504. lappuse
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Federal Trade Commission Regulation of Food , Drug and Cosmetic Advertising , Vol . I , Pg . 8 , Earl W. Kintner Truthful Disparagement Under the Federal Trade Commission Act , Vol . III , Pg . 319 , Daniel J ...
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Federal Trade Commission Regulation of Food , Drug and Cosmetic Advertising , Vol . I , Pg . 8 , Earl W. Kintner Truthful Disparagement Under the Federal Trade Commission Act , Vol . III , Pg . 319 , Daniel J ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation