would have done so ?" spoken with a somewhat negative emphasis. "I think he would," spoken with a positive emphasis. "Do you love peace so well, as Christ loved it, and can you do thus ?"

What answer I made, I know not, but there come rushing over my soul, the words of Christ, "I came not to send peace, but a sword." It seems almost to be spoken with an audible voice, and it sways the spirit more than all things else. I remember that Christ's doctrine was, first pure, then peaceable ;" that he too, was persecuted. So are my doctrines good; they ask only for the simple rights of a delegate, only that which must be recognized as just, by the impartial Father of the human race, and by his holy Son. Then come these mock pleading tones again upon my ear, and instinctively I think of the Judas kiss, and I arise, turning away from them all, and feeling a power which may, perhaps, never come to me again. There were angry men confronting me, and I caught the flashing of defiant eyes; but above me, and within me, and all around me, there was a spirit stronger than they all. At that moment, not the combined powers of earth and hell, could have tempted me to do otherwise than to stand firm. Moral and physical cowardice were subdued, thanks to that Washington delegate, for the sublime strength, roused by his question, "Would Christ have done so ?"

That stormy scene is passed; that memorable time, when chivalrous men forgot the deference, which, according to their creed, is due to woman, and forgot it, as they publicly said, because a woman claimed a right upon the platform; and so they neither recognized her equality of rights, nor her conceded courtesy as a lady. This was neither just nor gallant, but to me it was vastly preferable, to those appeals made to me as a lady-appeals which never would have been made to a man, under the same circumstances; and which only served to show me the estimation in which they held womanhood. It reminded me of a remark which was made, concerning the Brick Chapel meeting "If you had spoken words of flattery, they would have done what you wanted."

:

Let the past, be the past. "Let the dead bury their dead," contain truths we well may heed. Is God the impartial Father of humanity? Is He no respecter of persons? Is it true that there is

known neither male nor female, in Christ Jesus? In my heart of hearts, I believe it is all true. I believe it is the foundation of the Golden Rule. And now let me tell you in conclusion, if it be true, this truth shall steal into your souls like the accents of childhood; it shall come like a bright vision of hope, to the desponding; it shall flash upon the incredulous, it shall twine like a chain of golden arguments about the reason of the skeptic.

That which is right, is right eternally, both for man and for woman. Where God has given ability, to act in any direction, he has given the right to act. Then remember, that idea is written in the book of fate. Pens dipped in gall, may essay to efface the record; dark waters of selfish malice may flow over it; fires kindled in Hades may pour their flames upon it, but yet, it shall assert itself as the unfailing law of the harmonious universe of God.

WM. LLOYD GARRISON. Having listened to the narration of the action of the World's Convention, in New York, I rise to offer some resolutions, by which the sense of this convention may be obtained. I happened to be an eye-witness of these proceedings, and I bear witness to the accuracy of the account, given us this evening, by Miss Brown. I have seen many tumultuous meetings in my day, but I think on no occasion have I ever seen anything more disgraceful to our common humanity, than when Miss Brown attempted to speak upon the platform of the World's Temperance Convention, in aid of the glorious cause which had brought that convention together. It was an outbreak of passion, contempt, indignation, and every vile emotion of the soul, throwing into the shade almost everything coming from the vilest of the vile, that I have ever witnessed on any occasion, or under any circumstances; venerable men, claiming to be holy men, the embassadors of Jesus Christ, losing all self respect, and transforming themselves into the most unmannerly and violent spirits, merely on account of the sex of the individual, who wished to address the assembly.

Miss Brown was asked, while standing on the platform, "Do you love the Temperance cause?" What could have been more insulting than such a question as that, at that moment? What but the Temperance cause, had brought her to the convention. Why had

she been delegated to take her seat in that body, except on the ground, that she was a devoted friend of the Temperance enterprise, and had an interest in every movement pertaining to the total abstinence cause? She had been delegated there by total abstinence societies, because of her fitness as a temperance woman, to advocate the Temperance cause, so dear to the hearts of all those who love perishing humanity. Was it the love of the Temperance cause that raised the out-cry against her? or, was it not simply contempt of woman, and an unwillingness that she should stand up anywhere, to bear her testimony against popular wrongs and crimes, the curses of the race? MISS BROWN. - Allow me to state one incident. A Doctor of Divinity was present at the meeting. His son. and daughter-in-law, stated to me the fact. "I said to my father, you had stormy times at the convention, to-day." "Yes," said the father, "stormy times." Said the son-"why didn't you allow her to speak?" "Ah," said the Doctor, "it was the principle of the thing!" But it so happened that the son and daughter, thought the principle a wrong one.

Mr. GARRISON.-Yes, it was the principle, that was at stake. It was not simply the making of a speech, at that convention, by a woman. By her speaking, something more was implied, for if woman could speak there, and for that object, she might speak elsewhere, for another object, and she might, peradventure, as my friend does, proceed to occupy a pulpit, and settle over a congregation. In fact, there is no knowing where the precedent would lead; reminding me of the man who hesitated to leave off his profanity, because, having left that off, he should have to leave off drinking, and if he left off drinking, he should have to leave off his tobacco and other vile habits. He liked symmetry of character, and so he was unwilling to take the first step toward reform.

:

The principle for which Miss Brown contended, was this every society has a right to determine who shall represent it in convention. Invitation was given to the "whole world," to meet there in convention, to promote the cause of Temperance. Our friend needed no credentials under the call. It is true, all societies were invited to send delegates, but in addition to that, all the friends of Temperance, throughout the world, were expressly and earnestly invited to be

present, and under that last express invitation, she had a right to come in as an earnest friend of the cause, and take her seat in the convention. When a body like that comes together, the principle is this, each delegate stands on the same footing, as every other delegate, and no one delegate, nor any number of delegates, has a right to exclude any other delegate, who has been sent there by any like society. Our friend had credentials from two societies, and thus was doubly armed; but she was put down by a most disgraceful minority of the convention, who succeeded in carrying their point. In view of all this, I would present, for the action of this convention, the following resolutions:

WHEREAS, a cordial invitation having been extended to all temperance societies, and all the friends of Temperance, throughout the world, to meet, personally, or by delegates, in a "World's Temperance Convention," in the city of New York, Sept. 6th and 7th, 1853:

And whereas, accepting this invitation in the spirit in which it was apparently given, the "South Butler Temperance Association," and the "Rochester Toronto Division of the Sons of Temperance," duly empowered the Rev. Antoinette L. Brown, to act in that convention, as their delegate, representative and advocate:

And whereas, on presenting herself at the time specified, her credentials were received by the committee on the roll of the convention, but, on rising to address the assembly, (though declared by the President to be entitled to the floor, and although his decision was repeatedly sustained by a majority of the delegates,) she was met with derisive outcries, insulting jeers, and the most rowdyish manifestations, by a shameless minority,-led on by the Rev. John Chambers, of Philadelphia, and encouraged by Gen. Carey, of Ohio, and other professed friends of the Temperance cause-so as to make it impossible for her to be heard, and thus virtually excluding her from the convention, in an ignominious manner, solely on account of her being a woman; therefore,

Resolved, That in the judgment of this convention, the treatment received by the Rev. Antoinette L. Brown, in the "World's Temperance Convention," (falsely so called) was in the highest degree disgraceful to that body, insulting to the societies whose credentials

she bore, worthy only of those who are filled with strong drink, and a scandal to the Temperance movement.

Resolved, That the thanks of this convention be given to Miss Brown, for having accepted the credentials so honorably proffered to her, by the temperance societies aforesaid, and claiming a right, not as a woman, but as a duly authorized delegate, an eloquent and devoted advocate of the Temperance enterprise, to a seat and voice in the "World's Temperance Convention ;" and for the firm, dignified and admirable manner, in which she met the storm of opprobrium and insult, which so furiously assailed her, on her attempting to advocate the beneficent movement, for the promotion of which, the convention was expressly called together.

HON. JOSHUA R. GIDDINGS. Ladies and gentlemen, although I had designed to take no active part in the proceedings, I cannot avoid rising, to second that resolution. When I learned of the appointing of this convention, it brought a thrill of joy to me. I had read the transactions to which the lady has made such feeling allusion. I had read and mourned over them, and I rejoiced that an opportunity was to be given to the people of Cleveland, and this western reserve, to tender their thanks to this convention, which had been appointed to meet upon the shores of Lake Erie; and that they also might see what sort of a greeting the friends of the rights of woman, would receive here. And I now rejoice at the hearty manner in which the convention has proceeded. I rejoice at the treatment the convention has received. Then I was about to say, the fogies of New York, if they could see and know all that they might see here, would not be like some spirits, whom Swedenburg says he saw in the other world. He found spirits who had been departed several years, who had not yet learned that they were dead. I think Rev. John Chambers would now look down and begin to suspect that he had departed. My friends, I know not how the remarks of Miss Brown fell upon your ears. I can only say, that they struck me with deep feelings of mortification, that at this noontide of the nineteenth century any human being, who can give her thoughts to an assembly in the eloquent manner in which she has spoken to us, has been treated as she was; and when this resolution of reproof, by my friend from Massachusetts