In the former the owner of a coal mine on the higher level worked out the whole of his coal, leaving no barrier between his mine and the mine on the lower level, so that the water percolating through the upper mine flowed into the lower mine, and obstructed... Elements of the Law of Torts for the Use of Students - 310. lappuseautors: Melville Madison Bigelow - 1896 - 416 lapasPilnskats - Par šo grāmatu
| Great Britain. Magistrates' cases - 1870 - 668 lapas
...В., NS, 376; 9 LT Rep. NS 412. In the former, the owner of a coal mine on tho higher level worked out the whole of his coal, leaving no barrier between his mine and the mine on the lower level, so that the water percolating through tbe upper mine flowed into the lower... | |
| 1879 - 494 lapas
...his neighbour. In Smith v. Kendrick (7 CB 564) the owner of a coal mine on the higher level worked out the whole of his coal, leaving no barrier between his mine and the mine on the lower level, so that the water percolating through the upper mine flowed into the lower... | |
| William Evans - 1879 - 802 lapas
...whole law of torts. Tims, in Smith v. Kenrick (&), the owner of a coal mine on the higher level worked out the whole of his coal, leaving no barrier between his mine and the mine on the lower level, so that the water percolating through the upper mine flowed into the lower... | |
| Francis Taylor Piggott - 1885 - 448 lapas
...resulting from natural use of land. In Smith v. Kenrick the owner of a coal mine on a higher level worked out the whole of his coal, leaving no barrier between his mine and the mine on the lower level, so that the water, percolating through the upper mine, flowed into the lower... | |
| Robert Campbell - 1894 - 868 lapas
...v. Williamson, 15 CB (N. s.) 376. In the former the owner of a coal mine on the higher level worked out the whole of his coal, leaving no barrier between his mine and the mine on the lower level, so that the water percolating through the upper mine flowed into the lower... | |
| Eugene Wambaugh - 1894 - 576 lapas
...Kenrick, 2 and Baird v. Williamson. » In the former the owner of a coal mine on the higher level worked out the whole of his coal, leaving no barrier between his mine and the mine on the lower level, so that the water percolating through the upper mine flowed into the lower... | |
| Australia. High Court - 1910 - 828 lapas
...and Baird v. Williamson (3) : — " In the former the owner of a coal mine on the higher level worked out the whole of his coal, leaving no barrier between his mine and the mine on the lower level, so that the water percolating through the upper mine flowed into the lower... | |
| Melville Madison Bigelow - 1907 - 556 lapas
...injurious results which follow.1 For example : The defendant, owner of a coal-mine above the plaintiffs mine, works out the whole of his coal, leaving no...course, and the defendant being entitled to remove all his coal. 2 Again : The defendant, under the like circumstances, does not merely suffer the water to... | |
| Francis Hermann Bohlen - 1925 - 1312 lapas
...supra, and Baird v. Williamson, supra. In the former the owner of a coal mine on the higher level worked out the whole of his coal, leaving no barrier between his mine and the mine on the lower Pfeiffer v. Brown, 165 Pa. 267 (1895), with which compare Strait v. Hover, 79 Ohio... | |
| Charles Albert Keigwin - 1915 - 604 lapas
...and Bairil vs. Williamson, xupra. In the former the owner of a coal mine on the higher level worked out the whole of his coal, leaving no barrier between his mine and the mine on the lower level, so that the water percolating through the upper mine flowed into the lower... | |
| |