Explanation of Proposed Income Tax Treaty (and Proposed Protocol) Between the United States and Mexico: Scheduled for a Hearing Before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, on October 27, 1993U.S. Government Printing Office, 1993 - 104 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 58.
1. lappuse
... treaty on October 27 , 1993 . The proposed treaty ( as amended by the proposed protocol ) is similar to other recent U.S. income tax treaties , the 1981 proposed U.S. model income tax treaty ( " U.S. model " ) , and the 1977 model income ...
... treaty on October 27 , 1993 . The proposed treaty ( as amended by the proposed protocol ) is similar to other recent U.S. income tax treaties , the 1981 proposed U.S. model income tax treaty ( " U.S. model " ) , and the 1977 model income ...
3. lappuse
... treaty would only be applied to the benefit of taxpayers . Differences between proposed treaty and model treaties The proposed treaty differs in certain respects from other U.S. income tax treaties and from the U.S. model and OECD model ...
... treaty would only be applied to the benefit of taxpayers . Differences between proposed treaty and model treaties The proposed treaty differs in certain respects from other U.S. income tax treaties and from the U.S. model and OECD model ...
4. lappuse
... United States nor Mexico under the proposed treaty . ( 6 ) The proposed treaty's definition of a permanent establishment diverges in some respects from the definition contained in the U.S. model . For instance , under the proposed treaty ...
... United States nor Mexico under the proposed treaty . ( 6 ) The proposed treaty's definition of a permanent establishment diverges in some respects from the definition contained in the U.S. model . For instance , under the proposed treaty ...
5. lappuse
Scheduled for a Hearing Before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, on October 27, 1993. ation of this rule that is not found in the U.S. model . Under the proposed treaty , this rule would not apply if in the ...
Scheduled for a Hearing Before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, on October 27, 1993. ation of this rule that is not found in the U.S. model . Under the proposed treaty , this rule would not apply if in the ...
6. lappuse
... treaty benefit . This rule is narrower in scope than the Code's force of attraction rules . ( 10 ) Both the U.S. model and the proposed treaty provide that in determining the business profits of a permanent establishment , there would ...
... treaty benefit . This rule is narrower in scope than the Code's force of attraction rules . ( 10 ) Both the U.S. model and the proposed treaty provide that in determining the business profits of a permanent establishment , there would ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
alimony amount apply assets tax attributable branch profits tax business profits charitable organization competent authority coun country of residence deductions dividends paid double taxation earned effectively connected enterprise entity establishment or fixed excise tax exemption fixed base foreign corporation foreign source income foreign tax credit immovable property income tax treaties interest paid limitation Mexican law Mexican resident NAFTA nonresident alien OECD model treaties payments payor percent permanent establishment permit posed treaty proposed protocol paragraph proposed treaty contains proposed treaty provides public company test purposes real property reinsurance REMIC resident of Mexico respect royalties saving clause similar source country tax subject to U.S. Tax Law taxable taxes imposed Technical Explanation TIEA tion trade or business trea treaty benefits treaty country treaty's U.S. branch U.S. citizen U.S. corporation U.S. income tax U.S. law U.S. model treaty U.S. person U.S. resident U.S. source income U.S. tax treaties U.S. trade U.S. treaty United withholding tax
Populāri fragmenti
30. lappuse - Commissioner is authorized to distribute, apportion, or allocate gross income, deductions, credits, or allowances between or among such organizations, trades, or businesses, if he determines that such distribution, apportionment, or allocation is necessary in order to prevent evasion of taxes or clearly to reflect the income of any of such organizations, trades, or businesses.
69. lappuse - royalties" as used in this Article means payments of any kind received as a consideration for the use of, or the right to use, any copyright of literary, artistic or scientific work including...
18. lappuse - The competent authorities of the Contracting States shall endeavour to resolve by mutual agreement any difficulties or doubts arising as to the interpretation or application of the Convention.
101. lappuse - State and shall be disclosed only to persons or authorities (including courts and administrative bodies) involved in the assessment or collection of, the enforcement or prosecution in respect of, or the determination of appeals in relation to, the taxes covered by the Convention. Such persons or authorities shall use the information only for such purposes. They may disclose the information in public court proceedings or in judicial decisions.
55. lappuse - For the purposes of the preceding paragraphs, the profits to be attributed to the permanent establishment shall be determined by the same method year by year unless there is good and sufficient reason to the contrary.
45. lappuse - corporation" includes associations, joint-stock companies, and insurance companies. (4) Domestic. The term "domestic" when applied to a corporation or partnership means created or organized in the United States or under the law of the United States or of any State or Territory. (5) Foreign. The term "foreign" when applied to a corporation or partnership means a corporation or partnership which is not domestic.
57. lappuse - State, and in either case conditions are made or imposed between the two enterprises in their commercial or financial relations which differ from those which would be made between independent enterprises, then any profits which would, but for those conditions have accrued to one of the enterprises, but by reason of those conditions, have not so accrued, may be included in the profits of that enterprise and taxed accordingly.
28. lappuse - ... income that is treated as effectively connected with the conduct of a US trade or business, a portion of such dividend will be considered US source income.
5. lappuse - However, no such deduction shall be allowed in respect of amounts, if any, paid (otherwise than towards reimbursement of actual expenses) by the permanent establishment to the head office of the enterprise or any of its other offices, by way of royalties, fees or other similar payments in return for the use of patents or other rights, or by way of commission, for specific services performed or for management, or, except in the case of a banking enterprise, by way of interest on moneys lent to the...
30. lappuse - Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Oversight of the House Committee on Ways and Means, 101st Cong., 2d Sess.