The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1949 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 75.
865. lappuse
... interest prior to exchange , the proportionate interest transferred by each person must be compar- ed with proportionate interest received by each person . Revenue Act 1926 , § 203 ( b ) ( 4 ) , and as amended , 26 U.S.C.A. § 112 ( b ) ...
... interest prior to exchange , the proportionate interest transferred by each person must be compar- ed with proportionate interest received by each person . Revenue Act 1926 , § 203 ( b ) ( 4 ) , and as amended , 26 U.S.C.A. § 112 ( b ) ...
868. lappuse
... interest acquired by each person be in substantial " proportion to his interest in the property prior to the exchange . " ( Em- phasis supplied . ) The interpretation ad- vanced by petitioner gives recognition to neither of the ...
... interest acquired by each person be in substantial " proportion to his interest in the property prior to the exchange . " ( Em- phasis supplied . ) The interpretation ad- vanced by petitioner gives recognition to neither of the ...
1087. lappuse
... interest prior to exchange , the pro- portionate interest transferred by each person must be compared with proportionate interest received by each person . Revenue Act 1926.724 . Mines . § 203 ( b ) ( 4 ) , and as amended , 26 U.S.C.A. ...
... interest prior to exchange , the pro- portionate interest transferred by each person must be compared with proportionate interest received by each person . Revenue Act 1926.724 . Mines . § 203 ( b ) ( 4 ) , and as amended , 26 U.S.C.A. ...
Saturs
Table of Cases Arranged by Circuit | 1 |
Statutes Construed | 7 |
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure | 8 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action affirmed agreement alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Asst attorney AUGUSTUS N bankruptcy Board cause certiorari charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 171 City Civil Procedure claim commerce Commissioner Company compensation complaint contract Corporation counsel Court of Appeals damages decision defendant defendant's denied dismiss District Court District Judge District of Columbia double indemnity employees evidence F.Supp fact Federal Rules fendant filed habeas corpus income injury insured Internal Revenue issue judgment jurisdiction jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed Labor liability libel ment motion negligence Office operation owner paid parties patent payment petition petitioner plaintiff prior art proceeding question railroad reasonable record regulations remanded reversed royalties S.Ct Section Stat statute suit summary judgment testimony Texas tion trial court Trust U. S. Atty United States Court United States District verdict vessel Washington York City