SCHEDULE 4.-Certain class I railroads reorganized since 1933 or still in process of reorganization—Analysis of $2,500,000,000 of securities stated in committee's reports to have been held valueless under plans of reorganization-Securities or claims held valueless-ICC value of property for rate-making purposes used to determine book value-Continued 150, 819, 102 37, 393, 997 758, 793, 976 558, 874, 457 77, 594, 067 $78, 323 122, 247, 129 150, 819, 102 30, 076, 712 2, 365, 594, 477 1, 834, 831, 242 257, 618, 681| 2, 600, 321 2, 600, 321 Column numbers correspond to those on schedule 2. Book value for securities or claims shown on ICC statement, determined by ICC as For bonds: From the total investment plus net current assets there has been de- For stock: From the total investment plus net current assets there has been de- The book values of securities or claims held valueless were then adjusted by the differ- *Estimate, based on available data. 1 C. of G. This stock was voluntarily surrendered to the trustee of the Central of Georgia 2 M. P. Warrants to purchase new Class B Common Stock at a cost of $100 per share Adjustment Bonds 3 Wab. Holders of old preferred stock received rights to purchase 81⁄2 shares of new stock DRGW. 300,000 no par shares of common stock shown at book value of $33,467,678. 78, 323 273, 066, 231 67, 470, 709 shareholder to purchase 3/100 of a share of new common at the rate of $10 per share from 7 MP. Amounts treated as valueless comtemplate that system security holders accept 8 NYNH&H. Par or stated amounts held valueless are stated on the basis that 10 CGW. These figures do not include $38,701,740 of accrued but unpaid dividends on 11 Erie. Amount held valueless computed by stating the new stock at $40 a share. SOURCES Basic data in Col. 1 from statement furnished by Interstate Commerce Commission to above. Determination of ICC value-Book values, as shown in ICC statement mentioned (b) ICC statistics of railways in the United States, 1939 blue book. (d) WCF&N plan of reorganization. ICC value of rate-making purposes-rate of return on value of property of all operating Securities held by corporations (Column 7, 8)-Plans of reorganization. Moody's Market Values (Column 10)-Commercial and Financial Chronicle. Moody's Railroads. It may be claimed that schedules 2 and 4 are unfair in utilizing the market values during the month preceding the respective bankruptcies, on the ground that these periods represented periods of depressed earnings and that values have increased manyfold since that time. If this claim were sound, it would mean that the appraisals of the market place today would be many times the figures shown in column 24 and that, consequently, much more is at stake than is indicated. An examination of the facts reveals that there is no support for this claim. THE MARKET VALUE TEST IS SOUND Practically all of these proceedings started in the years 1933 or 1935. The first group in 1933 included the following railroads: Akron, Canton & Youngstown; Chicago & Eastern Illinois; Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville; Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific; Missouri Pacific and subsidiaries; St. Louis-San Francisco; Spokane International. The second wave in 1935 included: Chicago & North Western; Chicago Great Western; Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific; Denver & Rio Grande Western; New York, New Haven & Hartford; St. Louis-Southwestern; Western Pacific. All of the rest of the bankruptcies in question came one or two at a time in various years. If the market value of the securities of these bankrupt roads are understated in the schedules and if their market value today would be many times their market value prior to bankruptcy, the same increase in value should be apparent in the market prices of the stock of railroads which did not go into reorganization. Schedule 5 compares current market prices with the average market prices in 1933 and 1935 of every major carrier in the United States which did not go into bankruptcy in the interim. It will be noted that the average market price of the securities of the nonbankrupt roads as of the close of business on May 17, 1947, was substantially the same as the average market price of the same securities in 1933 and 1935. There is no reason to expect that the market prices of securities of roads which went into bankruptcy would have fared any better than the securities of nonbankrupt roads if they had remained in the latter category. There is shown toward the bottom of that schedule the market prices of the common stocks of the four major railroads which have taken advantage of the Chandler or McLaughlin Acts in order to reorganize their corporate structures. It will be noted that the proceedings of the Baltimore & Ohio, Colorado & Southern, Delaware & Hudson, and the Lehigh Valley did not save the market values of their common stocks by that process. While for nonbankrupt roads as a whole market values on May 17, 1947, were not substantially different than the values in 1933 and 1935, the May 1947 values on the four roads which reorganized under special statute showed very substantial decreases in 1947. In fact the decrease compared with 1933 was about 49 percent and the decrease compared with 1935 was 23 percent. Thus, even if the $24,000,000 of securities by market value shown in schedule 2 as the maximum possible amount in the hands of small investors which had any reasonable expectation of survival, had been protected from the beginning by a statute similar to that proposed, it is probable that today they would have had a market value substantially lower than $24,000,000. (Schedule 5 is as follows:) SCHEDULE 5.-Common stock prices of certain class I railroads not reorganized under equity or sec. 77 bankruptcy proceedings, 1933, 1935, and May 17, 1947 Source of stock prices: 1933 and 1935-Average of high and low, shown in Moody's Railroads; May 17, 1947-Closing prices, from Wall Street Journal. 1 Roads reorganized under Chandler or McLaughlin Acts. 2 Average of bid-and-ask prices. THE STOCKHOLDERS WERE ADEQUATELY REPRESENTED The reports are also replete with statements that the small stockholders whose holdings are found to be without value in section 77 reorganizations are not in position to protect themselves. For example, report no. 1170, page 7, states: Moreover, these forfeitures are, in every case, at the expense of one class of securityholders who are largely inarticulate and are not represented by high-priced legal counsel * * * Schedule 6 reveals that the facts are to the contrary. It summarizes the fees and expenses approved by the Interstate Commerce Commission to be paid to counsel for the debtors in section 77 reorganizations and also to any stockholders' committees specially organized to give the stock representation independent of the representation given to it by the debtors themselves. It is of course a matter of common knowledge that the debtors were representative of the stockholders, their boards of directors having been elected by them. The total allowances for services and expenses to debtors' counsel in these cases (and there may be other allowances which were not readily available in preparing the analysis of the reports) is $771,441 while the services and expenses allowed to counsel for special stockholders' committees is $171,420 additional, or a total of $942,861. Additional allowances were also made to many committees of bondholders and to |