William K. Richardson, Hearing Before a Subcommittee .., on House Joint Resolution 498 ..., April 22, 19361936 - 268 lappuses |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
adapter air resistance angle Answer armor armor-piercing projectile Balle Benedict Crowell beveled base terminating bourrelet bullet caliber radius CHURCH Commissioner ELMORE common steel shell contour Court of Claims Cross-question curve CUSHMAN cylindrical body portion cylindrical portion Defendant defendant's Exhibit dimensions direct examination disclosed EKWALL Exhibit F Figure fired flight foot-seconds French fuse fuze Government shells inches infringement invention jectile joint resolution l'Armee Belge length the caliber letter letters patent Lissak long point marked Plaintiff's Exhibit objection ogival head ogival surface Ordnance and Gunnery Ordnance Department patent in suit PITTENGER plaintiff's patent pressure prior art projectiles illustrated range rear end reduced cylinder length reduced diameter referred res judicata Revue de l'Armee Richardson patent rotary velocity rotating band shot skin friction slightly exceeds Smith drawing specification square base streamline shell struck tapered base tapered rear tion United United States Army War Department witness
Populāri fragmenti
21. lappuse - The provision in section 5 of the act of June 25, 1910. as amended by the act of February...
251. lappuse - That if it shall have been transmitted with the consent of the claimant, or if it shall appear to the satisfaction of the court upon the facts established, that under existing laws or the provisions of this chapter...
214. lappuse - In this light to even the most skillful persons. It may have been under their very eyes. They may almost be said to have stumbled over it, but they certainly failed to see It, to estimate Its value, and to bring It into notice.
214. lappuse - Now that it has succeeded, it may seem very plain to anyone, that he could have done it as well. This is often the case with inventions of the greatest merit. It may be laid down as a general rule, though perhaps not an invariable one, that if a new combination and arrangement of known elements produce a new and beneficial result, never attained before, it is evidence of invention.
207. lappuse - The burden of proof is upon the defendants to establish this defense; for the grant of letters patent Is prima facie evidence that the patentee Is the first Inventor of the device described In the letters patent and of Its novelty.
212. lappuse - To make a valid claim for a combination, it is not necessary that the several elementary parts of the combination should act simultaneously. If those elementary parts are so arranged that the successive action of each contributes to produce some one practical result, which result, when attained, is the product of the simultaneous or successive action of all the elementary parts, viewed as one entire whole, a valid claim for thus combining those elementary parts may be made.
236. lappuse - In the 6th section of the patent act of 1836, it is declared that, " before any inventor shall receive a patent, he shall deliver a written description of his invention, in such full, clear, and exact terms, as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it appertains, to make...
219. lappuse - If it has done so, then the court is liberal in its construction of the patent to secure to the inventor the reward he deserves. If what he has done works only a slight step forward and that which he says is a discovery is on the border line between mere mechanical change and real invention, then his patent, if sustained, will be given a narrow scope and infringement will be found only in approximate copies of the new device.
251. lappuse - Claims, which shall proceed with the same in accordance with such rules as it may adopt and report to such House the facts in the case and the amount, where the same can be liquidated, including any facts bearing upon the question whether there has been delay or laches in presenting such claim or applying for such grant, gift, or bounty, and any facts bearing upon the question whether the bar of any statute of limitation should be removed or which shall be claimed to excuse the claimant for not having...
212. lappuse - A combination is patentable (1) if it produces new and useful results, though all the constituents of the combination were known and in common use before the combination was made, provided the results are a product of the combination, and not a mere aggregation of several results, each the product of one of the combined elements; (2) if it produces a different force, effect, or result in the combined forces or processes from that given by their separate parts and a new result is...