United States Supreme Court Reports, 108. sējumsLawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1992 First series, books 1-43, includes "Notes on U.S. reports" by Walter Malins Rose. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 91.
340. lappuse
... jury regard ing its capital sentencing role . Such a challenge goes to the core of the accu- racy of the verdict ; it asks whether the defendant was sentenced by the jury according to the law . Bollenbach v United States , 326 US 607 ...
... jury regard ing its capital sentencing role . Such a challenge goes to the core of the accu- racy of the verdict ; it asks whether the defendant was sentenced by the jury according to the law . Bollenbach v United States , 326 US 607 ...
576. lappuse
... jury witnesses from revealing their testimony in cases where the grand jury term expires and the investiga- tion is continued , since the Supreme Court is not confronted with such a situation in the case at hand . Evidence §§ 859 , 904.3 ...
... jury witnesses from revealing their testimony in cases where the grand jury term expires and the investiga- tion is continued , since the Supreme Court is not confronted with such a situation in the case at hand . Evidence §§ 859 , 904.3 ...
736. lappuse
... jury's sen- tencing determination , and the jury is required to weigh any mitigating factors against the aggravating cir- cumstances . Although these differ- ences complicate the questions raised , we do not believe that they dictate ...
... jury's sen- tencing determination , and the jury is required to weigh any mitigating factors against the aggravating cir- cumstances . Although these differ- ences complicate the questions raised , we do not believe that they dictate ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
28 USCS 42 USCS 96 S Ct action aggravating circumstance alleged annotation references antipsychotic apply argued Auto-Cite Blackmun Board Brennan circum claim Clause concurring Congress consider constitutional corporations counsel Court of Appeals criminal death penalty death sentence decision defendant determine Disbarment dissenting District Court diversity jurisdiction drugs due process Eighth Amendment employees factor February 26 federal courts filed Fourteenth Amendments Fourth Amendment Government granted habeas instruction interest issue judgment jurisdiction jurors jury trial Justice L Ed 2d limited March 19 March 26 ment mitigating circumstances mitigating evidence nied NLRB opinion payment Peti Petition for writ Petitioner v United plaintiff political prison procedural reasonable remanded remedy respondent rule Scalia sion Sixth Amendment State's statute statutory Stevens supra Supreme Court tion tioner Title VII Tucker Act union United States 494 United States Court USCS violation writ of certiorari