Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1963 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 31.
57. lappuse
... testimony taken in the interference or require an independent investigation . Such motions are heard and decided by the Examiner of Inter- ferences , not the Primary Examiner , and as noted else- where , a decision granting such a ...
... testimony taken in the interference or require an independent investigation . Such motions are heard and decided by the Examiner of Inter- ferences , not the Primary Examiner , and as noted else- where , a decision granting such a ...
64. lappuse
... testimony in chief , and in which the other party shall complete the testimony on his side , and a further time in which the junior party may take rebutting testimony , but he shall take no other testimony . If there be more than two ...
... testimony in chief , and in which the other party shall complete the testimony on his side , and a further time in which the junior party may take rebutting testimony , but he shall take no other testimony . If there be more than two ...
78. lappuse
Testimony ; Requirements in Taking Testimony must be taken according to Rules 271 to 286 , inclusive . Evidence not so taken and filed will not be considered.1 Subpoena of witnesses , their attendance and the produc- tion of documents ...
Testimony ; Requirements in Taking Testimony must be taken according to Rules 271 to 286 , inclusive . Evidence not so taken and filed will not be considered.1 Subpoena of witnesses , their attendance and the produc- tion of documents ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 19 |
Advisability of Copying Claims Proposing | 25 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action amend appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC cause CCPA claims Com'r Pats Commissioner Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact ference filing final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interference counts involved issue judgment junior party jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion motion to dissolve notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office period petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention proceedings proposed Count Public question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation Request respect result senior specification steps structure subject matter Supp supra taken taking Term testimony tion United USPQ