Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1963 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 11.
112. lappuse
... Proposed Count A includes elements of Counts 1 , 2 and 3 with modifications drawn from Counts 4 and 5 but is designed to define an important feature of the invention , namely , the provision for telescoping of the panels under pressure ...
... Proposed Count A includes elements of Counts 1 , 2 and 3 with modifications drawn from Counts 4 and 5 but is designed to define an important feature of the invention , namely , the provision for telescoping of the panels under pressure ...
116. lappuse
... proposed Counts A , B and C , are concerned . There can , therefore , be no basis for considering the oper- ation or function as inherent in the structure of the ... proposed count ) The final phrase and element of proposed Count D , 116.
... proposed Counts A , B and C , are concerned . There can , therefore , be no basis for considering the oper- ation or function as inherent in the structure of the ... proposed count ) The final phrase and element of proposed Count D , 116.
117. lappuse
... count . As to Proposed Count E Proposed Count E , which is copied from Claim 9 of the Junior Party's application is objectionable for the same reasons and upon the same grounds as proposed Count D. Additionally , it is misdescriptive ...
... count . As to Proposed Count E Proposed Count E , which is copied from Claim 9 of the Junior Party's application is objectionable for the same reasons and upon the same grounds as proposed Count D. Additionally , it is misdescriptive ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 19 |
Advisability of Copying Claims Proposing | 25 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
49 CCPA 50 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ Action under 35 affidavits application for patent assignee Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Botnen burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Corp Court of Customs cross beams Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosed disclosure effect estoppel Examiner of Interferences ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor involved judgment junior party L.Ed Manual motion period motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule operation panels Party's application Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office patentable subject matter petition Primary Examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice res judicata Rule 94 senior show cause specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra tion