Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1963 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 11.
112. lappuse
... Proposed Count A includes elements of Counts 1 , 2 and 3 with modifications drawn from Counts 4 and 5 but is designed to define an important feature of the invention , namely , the provision for telescoping of the panels under pressure ...
... Proposed Count A includes elements of Counts 1 , 2 and 3 with modifications drawn from Counts 4 and 5 but is designed to define an important feature of the invention , namely , the provision for telescoping of the panels under pressure ...
116. lappuse
... proposed Counts A , B and C , are concerned . There can , therefore , be no basis for considering the oper- ation or function as inherent in the structure of the ... proposed count ) The final phrase and element of proposed Count D , 116.
... proposed Counts A , B and C , are concerned . There can , therefore , be no basis for considering the oper- ation or function as inherent in the structure of the ... proposed count ) The final phrase and element of proposed Count D , 116.
117. lappuse
... count . As to Proposed Count E Proposed Count E , which is copied from Claim 9 of the Junior Party's application is objectionable for the same reasons and upon the same grounds as proposed Count D. Additionally , it is misdescriptive ...
... count . As to Proposed Count E Proposed Count E , which is copied from Claim 9 of the Junior Party's application is objectionable for the same reasons and upon the same grounds as proposed Count D. Additionally , it is misdescriptive ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 19 |
Advisability of Copying Claims Proposing | 25 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action amend appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC cause CCPA claims Com'r Pats Commissioner Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact ference filing final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interference counts involved issue judgment junior party jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion motion to dissolve notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office period petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention proceedings proposed Count Public question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation Request respect result senior specification steps structure subject matter Supp supra taken taking Term testimony tion United USPQ