Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1963 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 48.
2. lappuse
... prior inventor . " It is apparent from the statute , Rule 201 , and the deci- sions , that the object of an interference proceeding is to determine the question of priority of invention and ordi- 1 Applied in Lyon v . Bausch & Lomb ...
... prior inventor . " It is apparent from the statute , Rule 201 , and the deci- sions , that the object of an interference proceeding is to determine the question of priority of invention and ordi- 1 Applied in Lyon v . Bausch & Lomb ...
29. lappuse
... prior to the filing date of his application . " ( d ) The preliminary statement can in no case be used as evidence in behalf of the party making it . " Rule 2242 restricts reliance on a prior application for the benefit of its filing ...
... prior to the filing date of his application . " ( d ) The preliminary statement can in no case be used as evidence in behalf of the party making it . " Rule 2242 restricts reliance on a prior application for the benefit of its filing ...
30. lappuse
" A party will not be permitted to rely on a prior application to obtain the benefit of its filing date unless the prior application is specified in the notice of inter- ference or is set forth in the preliminary statement . A prior ...
" A party will not be permitted to rely on a prior application to obtain the benefit of its filing date unless the prior application is specified in the notice of inter- ference or is set forth in the preliminary statement . A prior ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 19 |
Advisability of Copying Claims Proposing | 25 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action amend appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC cause CCPA claims Com'r Pats Commissioner Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact ference filing final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interference counts involved issue judgment junior party jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion motion to dissolve notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office period petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention proceedings proposed Count Public question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation Request respect result senior specification steps structure subject matter Supp supra taken taking Term testimony tion United USPQ