Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1963 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 29.
40. lappuse
... period will be fixed within which the vari- ous motions specified in Rules 232 to 236 may be brought by the parties . The period , not less than thirty days , will be fixed by an examiner of inter- ferences in the notice referred to in ...
... period will be fixed within which the vari- ous motions specified in Rules 232 to 236 may be brought by the parties . The period , not less than thirty days , will be fixed by an examiner of inter- ferences in the notice referred to in ...
52. lappuse
... period will not be considered . " Thus , there is no motion period in an interference de- clared on motion in a previous interference.1 Additional points pertaining to the application of Rules 233 , 234 are stated in the Manual . 1 Page ...
... period will not be considered . " Thus , there is no motion period in an interference de- clared on motion in a previous interference.1 Additional points pertaining to the application of Rules 233 , 234 are stated in the Manual . 1 Page ...
107. lappuse
... Period The parties to the above - entitled interference are hereby notified that their preliminary statements are ... period expires September 13 , 1954 . ... and No. and No. ; .... filed April 29 , 1953 , filed April 23 , 1953 , Patent ...
... Period The parties to the above - entitled interference are hereby notified that their preliminary statements are ... period expires September 13 , 1954 . ... and No. and No. ; .... filed April 29 , 1953 , filed April 23 , 1953 , Patent ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 19 |
Advisability of Copying Claims Proposing | 25 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action amend appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC cause CCPA claims Com'r Pats Commissioner Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact ference filing final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interference counts involved issue judgment junior party jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion motion to dissolve notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office period petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention proceedings proposed Count Public question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation Request respect result senior specification steps structure subject matter Supp supra taken taking Term testimony tion United USPQ