Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1963 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 22.
9. lappuse
... interpreted in the Dickinson case , cit . supra , p . 3 , note . See Manual , Sec . 1101.03 re disposition and ... interpretation of patent claim . 4 * Rule 116. See Manual , Secs . 1101.01 ( i , o ) ; 1101.02 ( g ) ; 1105.03 . As ...
... interpreted in the Dickinson case , cit . supra , p . 3 , note . See Manual , Sec . 1101.03 re disposition and ... interpretation of patent claim . 4 * Rule 116. See Manual , Secs . 1101.01 ( i , o ) ; 1101.02 ( g ) ; 1105.03 . As ...
17. lappuse
... interpreted as broadly as its language will permit . The interpretation must be reasonable , however , and may not be extended to cover matter to which the count was not intended to relate.2 In this connection , " means " for performing ...
... interpreted as broadly as its language will permit . The interpretation must be reasonable , however , and may not be extended to cover matter to which the count was not intended to relate.2 In this connection , " means " for performing ...
92. lappuse
... interpreted to mean movement longitudinally of the axis of the car , as contended by the adverse party , the count would read ... interpretation of an interference count would render the claim unpatent- able as describing an unpatentable ...
... interpreted to mean movement longitudinally of the axis of the car , as contended by the adverse party , the count would read ... interpretation of an interference count would render the claim unpatent- able as describing an unpatentable ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 19 |
Advisability of Copying Claims Proposing | 25 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action amend appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC cause CCPA claims Com'r Pats Commissioner Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact ference filing final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interference counts involved issue judgment junior party jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion motion to dissolve notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office period petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention proceedings proposed Count Public question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation Request respect result senior specification steps structure subject matter Supp supra taken taking Term testimony tion United USPQ