No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 92.
21. lappuse
If the application or patent of a party included in the interference is a division or continua . tion of a prior application and the examiner has determined that it is entitled to the filing date of such prior application , the notice ...
If the application or patent of a party included in the interference is a division or continua . tion of a prior application and the examiner has determined that it is entitled to the filing date of such prior application , the notice ...
22. lappuse
Jurisdiction is fixed by Rule 211 : ' Upon the institution and declaration of the interference , as provided in Rule 209 , the examiners of interferences will take jurisdiction of the same , which will then become a contested case .
Jurisdiction is fixed by Rule 211 : ' Upon the institution and declaration of the interference , as provided in Rule 209 , the examiners of interferences will take jurisdiction of the same , which will then become a contested case .
48. lappuse
The Interference Examiner then sends a letter to the parties informing them that the interference has been withdrawn and that the proceeding is terminated . The Primary Examiner then acts upon the applications as though no interference ...
The Interference Examiner then sends a letter to the parties informing them that the interference has been withdrawn and that the proceeding is terminated . The Primary Examiner then acts upon the applications as though no interference ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Interference in Case of Common Ownership | 11 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 19 |
Autortiesības | |
1 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action amend appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC cause CCPA claims Com'r Pats Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact ference filing final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interference counts interference proceeding involved issue judgment junior party jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion motion to dissolve notice obtained old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office period petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention proceedings proposed Count Public question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation Request respect senior specification steps structure subject matter Supp supra taken taking testimony tion United USPQ