No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 8.
13. lappuse
75 , infra ; also In re Nelson and Shabica , 280 F. 2d 172 ( CCPA 1960 ) to the effect that the statute is applied alike in ex parte and inter partes cases ; In re Arnold N. Johnson , 282 F. 2d 370 ( CCPA 1960 ) ; In re Charles J.
75 , infra ; also In re Nelson and Shabica , 280 F. 2d 172 ( CCPA 1960 ) to the effect that the statute is applied alike in ex parte and inter partes cases ; In re Arnold N. Johnson , 282 F. 2d 370 ( CCPA 1960 ) ; In re Charles J.
22. lappuse
All questions involved are to be determined inter partes and the examiners are forbidden to discuss them ex parte , Manual , Sec . 1111.01 . As to converting an application from joint to sole or vice versa , see Manual , Sec .
All questions involved are to be determined inter partes and the examiners are forbidden to discuss them ex parte , Manual , Sec . 1111.01 . As to converting an application from joint to sole or vice versa , see Manual , Sec .
55. lappuse
As these questions arise in inter partes proceedings , they may not properly be considered or determined ex parte . The opposing parties are entitled to a hearing in accordance with Rule 236 . Upon the filing of motions other than a ...
As these questions arise in inter partes proceedings , they may not properly be considered or determined ex parte . The opposing parties are entitled to a hearing in accordance with Rule 236 . Upon the filing of motions other than a ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Interference in Case of Common Ownership | 11 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 19 |
Autortiesības | |
1 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action amend appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC cause CCPA claims Com'r Pats Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact ference filing final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interference counts interference proceeding involved issue judgment junior party jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion motion to dissolve notice obtained old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office period petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention proceedings proposed Count Public question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation Request respect senior specification steps structure subject matter Supp supra taken taking testimony tion United USPQ