Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1963 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 18.
18. lappuse
... given the meaning which was given it in the proceedings resulting in the issuance of the patent . In other words , the meaning of the issue must be determined by the specification of the patent from which it derived.5 1 Wyland v ...
... given the meaning which was given it in the proceedings resulting in the issuance of the patent . In other words , the meaning of the issue must be determined by the specification of the patent from which it derived.5 1 Wyland v ...
31. lappuse
... given a specified time within which he may remedy it by an amended state- ment , subject to restriction as specified in the notice of defects under Rule 221 , in the further proceedings in the interference if he fail so to do ...
... given a specified time within which he may remedy it by an amended state- ment , subject to restriction as specified in the notice of defects under Rule 221 , in the further proceedings in the interference if he fail so to do ...
53. lappuse
... given the benefit of such an application . ' The considerations involved are stated in the Manual : 2 “ In deciding a motion of this nature , it is usually advisable first to determine exactly which counts will be involved in the final ...
... given the benefit of such an application . ' The considerations involved are stated in the Manual : 2 “ In deciding a motion of this nature , it is usually advisable first to determine exactly which counts will be involved in the final ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 19 |
Advisability of Copying Claims Proposing | 25 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
49 CCPA 50 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ Action under 35 affidavits application for patent assignee Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Botnen burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Corp Court of Customs cross beams Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosed disclosure effect estoppel Examiner of Interferences ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor involved judgment junior party L.Ed Manual motion period motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule operation panels Party's application Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office patentable subject matter petition Primary Examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice res judicata Rule 94 senior show cause specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra tion