Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1963 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 37.
131. lappuse
... failing to dissolve the said inter- ference as to both counts thereof on the ground that the said senior party is not entitled to make the claims com- prising the interference counts or any of them . 5. The Board erred in failing to ...
... failing to dissolve the said inter- ference as to both counts thereof on the ground that the said senior party is not entitled to make the claims com- prising the interference counts or any of them . 5. The Board erred in failing to ...
132. lappuse
... failing to interpret the counts of the said interference , and each of them , accord- ing to the disclosure of the patent to the junior party , in which they originated , and as allowed therein . 9. That the Board erred in finding that ...
... failing to interpret the counts of the said interference , and each of them , accord- ing to the disclosure of the patent to the junior party , in which they originated , and as allowed therein . 9. That the Board erred in finding that ...
vii. lappuse
... failure to copy suggested claim ( Rule 203 ( b ) ) Distinction of types ( Rule 263 ) Terminating interference ( Rule 262 ) Under 35 U.S.C. 253 , effect Disclosure See Application , Claims , Counts , Evidence , Judicial Notice Drawing ...
... failure to copy suggested claim ( Rule 203 ( b ) ) Distinction of types ( Rule 263 ) Terminating interference ( Rule 262 ) Under 35 U.S.C. 253 , effect Disclosure See Application , Claims , Counts , Evidence , Judicial Notice Drawing ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 19 |
Advisability of Copying Claims Proposing | 25 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action amend appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC cause CCPA claims Com'r Pats Commissioner Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact ference filing final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interference counts involved issue judgment junior party jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion motion to dissolve notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office period petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention proceedings proposed Count Public question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation Request respect result senior specification steps structure subject matter Supp supra taken taking Term testimony tion United USPQ