Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1963 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 22.
112. lappuse
... define an important feature of the invention , namely , the provision for telescoping of the panels under pressure , which is not present in any of the references , more clearly and in some respects more broadly than it is defined in ...
... define an important feature of the invention , namely , the provision for telescoping of the panels under pressure , which is not present in any of the references , more clearly and in some respects more broadly than it is defined in ...
132. lappuse
... defined in the said interference counts . 10. The Board erred in failing to find that the appli- cation of the said senior party does not disclose automati- cally controlled means as defined in the interference counts . 11. That the ...
... defined in the said interference counts . 10. The Board erred in failing to find that the appli- cation of the said senior party does not disclose automati- cally controlled means as defined in the interference counts . 11. That the ...
133. lappuse
... definition of the interference counts in respect to the centrifugal clutch K thereof , because operation of the said ... defined in the interference counts . ( Add Notice of Service ) By ( Appellant ) His Attorneys Notice of Election by ...
... definition of the interference counts in respect to the centrifugal clutch K thereof , because operation of the said ... defined in the interference counts . ( Add Notice of Service ) By ( Appellant ) His Attorneys Notice of Election by ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
49 CCPA 50 CCPA 72 USPQ 99 USPQ Action under 35 affidavits application for patent assignee Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Botnen burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Corp Court of Customs cross beams Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosed disclosure effect estoppel Examiner of Interferences ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor involved judgment junior party L.Ed Manual motion period motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule operation panels Party's application Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office patentable subject matter petition Primary Examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice res judicata Rule 94 senior show cause specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra tion