Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1963 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 78.
52. lappuse
... counts by the parties , it is the Exam- iner's duty to cite such references as may anticipate the proposed counts , making a search for this purpose if necessary . However , if the decision includes a new ground for holding a proposed count ...
... counts by the parties , it is the Exam- iner's duty to cite such references as may anticipate the proposed counts , making a search for this purpose if necessary . However , if the decision includes a new ground for holding a proposed count ...
112. lappuse
... counts present in the interference , at the same time avoiding the prior art . Proposed Count B is more limited than proposed Count A and is directed , as are Counts 4 and 5 , to the structure as installed . Proposed Count C is designed ...
... counts present in the interference , at the same time avoiding the prior art . Proposed Count B is more limited than proposed Count A and is directed , as are Counts 4 and 5 , to the structure as installed . Proposed Count C is designed ...
122. lappuse
... counts ) Count 2 , which derives from claim 2 of the said patent , reads as follows : ( here recite counts ) It is apparent that the two counts are identical except that Count 2 includes additionally ( recite additional language ) This ...
... counts ) Count 2 , which derives from claim 2 of the said patent , reads as follows : ( here recite counts ) It is apparent that the two counts are identical except that Count 2 includes additionally ( recite additional language ) This ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 19 |
Advisability of Copying Claims Proposing | 25 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action amend appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC cause CCPA claims Com'r Pats Commissioner Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact ference filing final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interference counts involved issue judgment junior party jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion motion to dissolve notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office period petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention proceedings proposed Count Public question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation Request respect result senior specification steps structure subject matter Supp supra taken taking Term testimony tion United USPQ