Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1963 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 81.
7. lappuse
... claims are made within the time specified.2 Claims ; Copying from Another's Application or Patent Rule 203 ( d ) requires acknowledgement of copying from another's application of a claim not suggested by the Ex- aminer , when it is ...
... claims are made within the time specified.2 Claims ; Copying from Another's Application or Patent Rule 203 ( d ) requires acknowledgement of copying from another's application of a claim not suggested by the Ex- aminer , when it is ...
8. lappuse
... claiming substantially the same subject matter within that period , was extended in the Tanke case to sanction the copying of claims later , despite difference in scope of language used in earlier claims.1 But the making of a broad claim ...
... claiming substantially the same subject matter within that period , was extended in the Tanke case to sanction the copying of claims later , despite difference in scope of language used in earlier claims.1 But the making of a broad claim ...
99. lappuse
... ( Claims here set forth ) Response to Suggestion of Claims by Examiner This may be in the form of an ordinary amendment in- corporating the suggested claims . Amendment Copying Claims of Patent The amendment is in the usual form for adding ...
... ( Claims here set forth ) Response to Suggestion of Claims by Examiner This may be in the form of an ordinary amendment in- corporating the suggested claims . Amendment Copying Claims of Patent The amendment is in the usual form for adding ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
49 CCPA 50 CCPA 72 USPQ 99 USPQ Action under 35 affidavits application for patent assignee Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Botnen burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Corp Court of Customs cross beams Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosed disclosure effect estoppel Examiner of Interferences ference filing date infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor involved judgment junior party L.Ed Manual motion period motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule operation panels Party's application Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office patentable subject matter petition Primary Examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice res judicata Rule 94 senior show cause specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra tion