Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1963 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 17.
45. lappuse
... party's application as , for example , on the matter of operativeness or right to make , should not be considered but affidavits relating to the prior art may be considered by analogy to Rule 132 . " If there is considerable doubt as to ...
... party's application as , for example , on the matter of operativeness or right to make , should not be considered but affidavits relating to the prior art may be considered by analogy to Rule 132 . " If there is considerable doubt as to ...
113. lappuse
... Party ) . ( Similarly apply each additional proposed count . ) Respectfully submitted , ( Sig . ) Attorneys for the party ( Certificate of service ) Senior Party's Objections to Junior Party's Motion to Amend Interference Comes now the ...
... Party ) . ( Similarly apply each additional proposed count . ) Respectfully submitted , ( Sig . ) Attorneys for the party ( Certificate of service ) Senior Party's Objections to Junior Party's Motion to Amend Interference Comes now the ...
114. lappuse
not disclosed in the Junior Party's application and the Junior Party has no right to make said claims or any of them . Proposed Count A ( ... ... modified ) reads : Claim 2 , as amended and ( Here set forth proposed count ) While the ...
not disclosed in the Junior Party's application and the Junior Party has no right to make said claims or any of them . Proposed Count A ( ... ... modified ) reads : Claim 2 , as amended and ( Here set forth proposed count ) While the ...
Saturs
Introduction | 1 |
Attorneys Representation of Parties with | 19 |
Advisability of Copying Claims Proposing | 25 |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action amend appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board burden of proof CADC cause CCPA claims Com'r Pats Commissioner Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosed disclosure effect entitled et al evidence Examiner of Interferences extended fact ference filing final hearing function ground held infra inter interference interference counts involved issue judgment junior party jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion motion to dissolve notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office period petition preliminary statement present Primary Examiner prior priority of invention proceedings proposed Count Public question reads reasons record reduction to practice reference relation Request respect result senior specification steps structure subject matter Supp supra taken taking Term testimony tion United USPQ