Consent Decree Program of the Department of Justice: Hearings Before the Antitrust Subcommittee, (Subcommittee No. 5), ... Pt.1, Vol. I [-II], Oil Pipelines, 2. daļa,3. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1957 - 1666 lappuses |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
allegations American Telephone answer Antitrust Division antitrust laws apparatus and equipment AT&T Attorney BALDRIDGE basis Bell Laboratories Bell operating companies Bell System Brownell cable CHAIRMAN charge CLASS SUB PATENT committee competition complaint Congress consent decree consent judgment correct cost counsel court CROSLAND defendants Department of Justice discussed dismissal divestiture effect EISENBERG EMANUEL CELLER fact Federal Communications Commission filed FOOTE Government HARKINS hearing HOLTZMAN indicated investigation Judge Barnes Judge Hansen Justice Department KEATING KILGORE KRAMER letter licenses MALETZ manufacture matter memorandum ment MILLER monopoly Moulton Murphy negotiations P. S. Comm PATENT CLASS SUB percent plant PUR NS question reason recall recollection regulatory request respect settlement Sherman Act staff statement STRASSBURG SUB PATENT CLASS subcommittee suit tained in paragraph tele Telephone & Telegraph telephone apparatus telephone companies telephone equipment telephone service testified testimony tion United Western Electric Western's prices wire
Populāri fragmenti
4397. lappuse - An act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies," commonly known as the Sherman Act, as amended.
3706. lappuse - The point has been made that the President of the United States has issued an order that none of this information can be released to the Congress and that therefore the Congress has no right to question the judgment of the President in making that decision. I say that that proposition cannot stand from a constitutional standpoint or on the basis of the merits...
4393. lappuse - Branch of the plaintiff except in the course of legal proceedings to which the United States is a party for the purpose of securing compliance with this Final Judgment, or as otherwise required by law.
4393. lappuse - Jurisdiction is retained for the purpose of enabling any of the parties to this Final Judgment to apply to this Court at any time for such further orders and directions as may be necessary or appropriate for the construction or carrying out of this Final Judgment, or the modification or termination of any of the provisions thereof or for the enforcement of compliance therewith or for the punishment of violations thereof.
4398. lappuse - ... is binding only upon the parties to the action, their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and upon those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of the order by personal service or otherwise.
4425. lappuse - Now, therefore, before any testimony has been taken herein, and without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact...
4393. lappuse - For the purpose of determining or securing compliance with this Final Judgment, duly authorized representatives of the Department of Justice shall, upon written request of the Attorney General, or the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division, and on reasonable notice to...
4093. lappuse - Western is ordered and directed to maintain cost accounting methods that conform with such accounting principles as may be generally accepted and that afford a valid basis, taking into account the magnitude and complexity of the manufacturing operations involved, for determining the cost to Western of equipment sold to AT & T and Bell Operating Companies for use by them in furnishing common carrier communications services.
4270. lappuse - In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and statement of consolidated income and earned surplus present fairly the financial position of the companies at November 30, 1956 and the results of their operations for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a basis consistent with that of the preceding year.
3747. lappuse - In exercising its discretion the court shall consider whether the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the original parties.