Beller vs. Jones (22 Ark., 92), 266.
Breding vs. Davis (76 Va., 639), 243.

Bullett vs. Worthington (3 Md. Ch., 99), 261.
Canover vs. Cooper (3 Barb., (N. Y.), 115), 261.
Caldwell vs. Drake (4 J. J. Marsh, 246), 245.
Carlton vs. Haywood (49 N. H., 316), 245.
Carlton vs. Lovejoy (54 Me., 445), 243.
Carris vs. Carris (24 N. J. Eq., 516), 224.
Clapsky vs. Wood (26 Kan., 650), 265.
Clark vs. Coch (9 Phila., (Pa.), 100), 255.
Cocke vs. Hannum (39 Miss., 423), 265.

Cole vs. Cole (5 Sneed, (Tenn.), 57; 191 Ill., 280), 220.
Cook vs. Bennett (51 N. H., 85), 260.

Dean vs. Avling (1 Rob. Ecc. Rep., 279), 222.
Dixon vs. Bell (5 M. & S., 198), 263.

Drinks vs. Grey (3 Fed. Rep., 852), 259.

Elliott vs. Gibbons (30 Bart., (N. Y.), 498), 260.
File vs. Unger (27 Ont. App., 468), 259.

Fisher vs. Bernard (65 Vt., 664), 218.
Fratina vs. Caslina (66 Vt., 275), 255.

Ganner vs. Skinner (71 Bush., Ky., 120), 260.
Gilley vs. Gilley (79 Me., 292), 260.
Grimmell vs. Wells (7 M. & G., 1033), 265.
Harris vs. Wallner (80 Ill., 197), 263.
Hawthorne vs. Beckwith (89 Va., 786), 245.
Hearsh vs. Sybert-Cheves (1 S. C., 177), 263.
Hetrick vs. Hetrick (13 Ind., 44), 245.
Higham vs. Vanosdol (101 Ind., 160), 255.
Hildreth vs. Camp (4 Ñ. J. L., 306), 245.
Johnson vs. Onstead (74 Mich., 437), 260.
Kelley vs. Davis (49 N. H., 187), 260.

Koonce vs. Wallace (7 Jones Law, (N. C.), 194), 218.
Lee vs. Hopkins (20 Ontario, 666), 245.

Lewis vs. Amis (44 Tex., 319, 341), 215.

MacKenzie vs. Lautensclager (113 Mich., 171), 255.

Malmbery vs. Bartos (83 Ill. App., 481), 259.

Mason vs. Hutchins (32 Vt., 780), 261.

Mowbry vs. Mowbry (68 Ill., 383), 261.
Marshall vs. Oakes (51 Me., 308), 245.
Morris vs. Morris (Wright, 630), 224.

O'Brian vs. Rau (3 Md., 186), 263.

Paige vs. Rainy (2 Hill, (N. Y.), 309), 255.
Perkins vs. Westcoat (3 Colo. App., 388), 260.
Prettyman vs. Williamson (39 Atl. Rep., 731), 255.
Reynolds vs. Reynolds (3 Allen, 605), 204.
Ritter vs. Ritter (5 Blackf., 81), 224.
Sharp vs. Williams (41 Kan., 56), 259.
Shaw vs. Partridge (17 Vt., 626), 243.
Sissung vs. Sissung (65 Mich., 680), 224.
State vs. Barney (14 R. I., 62), 265.
Todd vs. Todd (149 Pa. St., 61), 224.
Tuggle vs. Tuggle (97 Ga., 658), 265.

United States vs. Greene (3 Mason, (U. S.), 482), 265.
Wilson vs. Garrard (59 Ill., 51), 259.

Williams vs. Kent (15 Wend., (N. Y.), 360), 245.
Wing vs. Hibbert (8 Ohio Dec., 65), 260.

Woodward vs. Barnes (46 Vt., 332), 245.

Defendant's Intention that Misrepresentation Should be Acted on.. 133
Necessity that Plaintiff Should Have Acted Upon Representation. 138
Dogs, Liability for Damage by...

86

E

Entry Upon Land of Another, When Justifiable.

Equity......

.68, 70

15

Parent, Right to Bring Action for Seduction of Daughter.

Parties in Action of Tort..

Pollution of Water.....

Privileged Communications..

58

15

108

166

Distinguished from Trespass on the Case..

Distinguished from Trespass on the Case in Scott vs. Sheppard.

24-34

Where Concurrent Remedy with Trespass on the Case..

21

35

Trespass on the Case, Distinguished from Trespass.

21

Distinguished from Trespass on the Case in Scott vs. Sheppard....24, 34