United States Supreme Court Reports, 45. sējumsLawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1976 First series, books 1-43, includes "Notes on U.S. reports" by Walter Malins Rose. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 70.
167. lappuse
... exempt " within the meaning of the Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA ) . The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the District Court " insofar as appellants rely upon Exemption ( 3 ) " of the FOIA . Held : The SWAP Reports are exempt ...
... exempt " within the meaning of the Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA ) . The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the District Court " insofar as appellants rely upon Exemption ( 3 ) " of the FOIA . Held : The SWAP Reports are exempt ...
764. lappuse
... exempt [ b ] Documents held not exempt § 12. Department of the Treasury : [ a ] Documents held exempt [ b ] Documents held not exempt § 13. Renegotiation Board § 14. Interstate Commerce Commission § 15. Archivist of the United States ...
... exempt [ b ] Documents held not exempt § 12. Department of the Treasury : [ a ] Documents held exempt [ b ] Documents held not exempt § 13. Renegotiation Board § 14. Interstate Commerce Commission § 15. Archivist of the United States ...
779. lappuse
... exempt from disclosure under 5 USCS § 552 ( b ) ( 3 ) by operation of 18 USCS § 1905. The court said that the ordinary meaning of § 552 ( b ) ( 3 ) is that the exempting statute must itself specify the documents or categories of docu ...
... exempt from disclosure under 5 USCS § 552 ( b ) ( 3 ) by operation of 18 USCS § 1905. The court said that the ordinary meaning of § 552 ( b ) ( 3 ) is that the exempting statute must itself specify the documents or categories of docu ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
15 USCS 28 USCS 42 USCS 45 L Ed 95 S Ct action aliens alleged annexation antitrust laws appellees applied argued the cause backpay banks Circuit denied claim Clayton Act commerce Commission concurring Congress consideration or decision constitutional Cook Inlet corporation counsel Court of Appeals criminal defendant disclosure dissenting District Court evidence Exchange exclusionary rule exempt F Supp federal court filed Fourth Amendment Government held holding illegal infra issue judgment judicial June 16 June 23 jurisdiction jury trial Justice Douglas took L Ed 2d legislation ment Miranda warnings opinion ordinance overbreadth person Petition for writ petitioner plaintiffs proceedings prosecution provides purpose question rates reasonable regulations remanded respondent Securities Sherman Act sion Sixth Amendment Stat statement statute statutory supra Supreme Court tion tional titioner tive United States 422 United States Court violation writ of certiorari