The United States Patents QuarterlyAssociated Industry Publications, 1989 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 69.
1301. lappuse
... application for a design patent cannot be a division of an application for a mechanical patent , and thus entitled to the benefit of its filing date . Plaintiff pointed , to no avail , to more recent decisions of this court and of the ...
... application for a design patent cannot be a division of an application for a mechanical patent , and thus entitled to the benefit of its filing date . Plaintiff pointed , to no avail , to more recent decisions of this court and of the ...
1302. lappuse
... application labeled a " division " is in compliance with §120 . There are detailed factual questions to be resolved before it can be said that an application is entitled , under §120 , to the filing date of an earlier applica- tion ...
... application labeled a " division " is in compliance with §120 . There are detailed factual questions to be resolved before it can be said that an application is entitled , under §120 , to the filing date of an earlier applica- tion ...
1303. lappuse
... application , July 30 , 1946. But that is irrelevant . When the opinion was written , the 1952 Act had been in effect for over a year . The Act states that it applies to " fur- ther proceedings on applications pending on " January 1 ...
... application , July 30 , 1946. But that is irrelevant . When the opinion was written , the 1952 Act had been in effect for over a year . The Act states that it applies to " fur- ther proceedings on applications pending on " January 1 ...
Saturs
Additions and Corrections | 881 |
Classification Outline 101 | 901 |
Table of Cases 301 | 977 |
Autortiesības | |
1 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir 9th Cir advertising alleged alpha-olefins amended appeal application argues asserted attorney attorney's fees award barbecue sauce Blue Cross Blue Shield Brown & Sharpe CBNLIC cert claim 35 copy copyright infringement Corp corporation counterclaim COUNTRY TILES Cross and Blue damages defendant defendant's denied doctrine of equivalents dough DuPont entitled evidence F.Supp fact Fed.R.Civ.P Federal Circuit Federal district court filed fringement granted Halar hoop stress invalid invention issue jurisdiction Kalman Katzel Lanham Act Lemelson Letraset license likelihood of confusion Lladro manufacturer ment OxyTech Pantone party Patent and Trademark patent infringement Phillips plaintiff preliminary injunction prior art protection pursuant reasonable registration Rocky IV royalty Rule S.Ct service mark specification statute summary judgment tion trade dress trade secret trademark infringement Trademark Office trial U.S. Patent unfair competition United USPQ USPQ2d validity