The United States Patents QuarterlyAssociated Industry Publications, 1992 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 75.
1822. lappuse
... Office action be reset to the normal three ( 3 ) month period for response ; ( 2 ) that the finality of that Office action be with- drawn ; and ( 3 ) that the requirements of 37 CFR § 1.111 be waived . The petition is denied ...
... Office action be reset to the normal three ( 3 ) month period for response ; ( 2 ) that the finality of that Office action be with- drawn ; and ( 3 ) that the requirements of 37 CFR § 1.111 be waived . The petition is denied ...
1828. lappuse
... Office action was timely filed . However , applicant should note that the mere filing of a petition will not stay the period for response to an Office action . 37 CFR § 1.181 ( f ) . In any event , the propriety of the thirty ( 30 ) day ...
... Office action was timely filed . However , applicant should note that the mere filing of a petition will not stay the period for response to an Office action . 37 CFR § 1.181 ( f ) . In any event , the propriety of the thirty ( 30 ) day ...
1830. lappuse
... office . It is in this way that the general forms of claims dis- cussed herein have become those common- ly required as proper and best practise . While claim practice has undergone signifi- cant changes since 1836 , it appears that Office ...
... office . It is in this way that the general forms of claims dis- cussed herein have become those common- ly required as proper and best practise . While claim practice has undergone signifi- cant changes since 1836 , it appears that Office ...
Saturs
Additions and Corrections | 863 |
Classification Outline 101 | 885 |
Index Digest 201 | 895 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
9th Cir action advertising affidavits agreement alleged ALPO amended application argues assertion attorneys award Beraha Budish cert Chablis Chaides claim concluded copy copyright infringement Corp corporation counterclaim Court of Appeals damages defendant defendant's denied determine doctrine of equivalents double patenting Ellison entitled equitable estoppel evidence F.Supp fact Federal Circuit Federal district court filed finding fringement Gallo Georgia-Pacific granted Hako hopper invalid invention judicial jurisdiction laches Lanham Act license Lieberam likelihood of confusion litigation Magistrate-Judge mark ment Merchant & Evans Nescher parties Patent and Trademark patent infringement plaintiff preliminary injunction presumption prior art Procedure protection pursuant registration rule secondary meaning shear specification subject matter suit summary judgment Supp Symantec Tennant tiff's tion trade dress trade secrets trademark infringement Trademark Office TRADEMARKS AND UNFAIR trial Turtle Wax USPQ USPQ2d validity Werther's Original