 | United States - 1983 - 1340 lapas
...to acts or omissions of investigative or law enforcement officers of the United States Government, the provisions of this chapter and section 1346(b) of this title shall apply to any claim arising, on or after the date of the enactment of this proviso, out of assault,... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1942 - 74 lapas
...administrative determination under title II. Section 402 excepts from the operation of the act claims based upon an act or omission of an employee of the Government, exercising due care, performed in the execution of a statute or regulation, whether or not the statutory authority or the... | |
 | 1990 - 986 lapas
...enforcement officer. (4) On-base animal bite cases. (5) Personal injury from asbestos or radon. (6) Claims based upon an act or omission of an employee of the...care, in the execution of a statute or regulation. (7) Claims based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary... | |
 | 1993 - 630 lapas
...enforcement officer. (4) On-base animal bite cases. (5) Personal injury from asbestos or radon. (6) Claims based upon an act or omission of an employee of the...care, in the execution of a statute or regulation. (7) Claims based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary... | |
 | 2003 - 596 lapas
...enforcement officer. (4) On-base animal bite cases. (5) Personal injury from asbestos or radon. (6) Claims based upon an act or omission of an employee of the...government, exercising due care, in the execution ol a statute or regulation. (7) Claims based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise... | |
 | 1977 - 884 lapas
...payable if it — (a) Is based upon an act or omission of military personnel or a civilian employee, exercising due care, in the execution of a statute or regulation, whether or not the statute or regulation is valid; (b) Is based on the exercise or performance of, or the failure... | |
 | 1957 - 644 lapas
...rejected. The provisions of 28 USC § 2680 (a), excluding liability in instances where the claim is based upon an act or omission of an employee of the...care, in the execution of a statute or regulation is not applicable to the factual circumstances herein. Smith v US (1957, DC Va), 155 F Supp 605. [See... | |
 | 1952 - 1286 lapas
...his office or employment. ' ' Moreover, the Act specifically provides that it is not applicable to "any claim based upon an act or omission of an employee of the Government, exercising due care, MI the execution of a statute or regulation, whether or not such statute or regulation 'be valid ..."... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1954 - 364 lapas
...exceptions to Section 1346(b), but it is only necessary to discuss Subdivision (a) thereof as follows: "'The provisions of this chapter and section 1346(b)...this title shall not apply to — (a) Any claim based upcn an act or omission of any employee of the Government, exercising due care, in the execution of... | |
| |
Any claim based upon an act or omission of an employee of the Government, exercising due care, in the execution of a statute or regulation, whether or not such statute or regula. 
