Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 16. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1977 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 31.
10. lappuse
... mark and Defendant claimed it to be merely descriptive . The court refused to find that there was a likelihood that Heileman would be able to prove the mark to be merely descriptive . They noted that marks which impart information ...
... mark and Defendant claimed it to be merely descriptive . The court refused to find that there was a likelihood that Heileman would be able to prove the mark to be merely descriptive . They noted that marks which impart information ...
138. lappuse
Religious " Charge Cards " Violate Service Mark Plaintiff was the owner of the mark for the words MASTER CHARGE and the design of that credit card . Defendants pro- duced and began distributing plastic cards which closely re- sembled ...
Religious " Charge Cards " Violate Service Mark Plaintiff was the owner of the mark for the words MASTER CHARGE and the design of that credit card . Defendants pro- duced and began distributing plastic cards which closely re- sembled ...
233. lappuse
... mark to be a weak one , because it used the common word " air " and the term , " shield " both of which were descriptive . They found that Defendant's mark was not confus- ingly similar to the weak mark of the Plaintiff . Saunders v Air ...
... mark to be a weak one , because it used the common word " air " and the term , " shield " both of which were descriptive . They found that Defendant's mark was not confus- ingly similar to the weak mark of the Plaintiff . Saunders v Air ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and Other Actions 233 | 23 |
A Problem in | 31 |
Autortiesības | |
7 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action actual malice advertising amendment rights applied audience balance broadcast cable pay-TV cable television candidate CATV Citizens Comm claim commercial speech Commission common carrier communication consent order constitutional consumer Corp court found court held court noted D.C. Cir damages decision defamation Defendant Defendant's diversity economic exemption fairness doctrine Federal format freedom of expression Gertz granted included individual infringement injunction issue jurisdiction Justice liability libel licensee limited ment Midwest Video Corp newspaper obscene opinion person Plaintiff political prior restraint profit Progressive Rock prohibit public figure public interest published radio Red Lion regulation Report right to know Simants sion standard statement station statute strict liability Supp supra note Supreme Court system of freedom television text accompanying notes tion trademark trial unfair viewer violation WEFM York