No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 58.
10. lappuse
Meister Brau had applied that trademark to a lower calorie beer that they marked . Plaintiff , Miller Brewing Company , used the mark on its LITE Beer with a large advertising and marketing campaign . Defendant , Heileman Brewing Co.
Meister Brau had applied that trademark to a lower calorie beer that they marked . Plaintiff , Miller Brewing Company , used the mark on its LITE Beer with a large advertising and marketing campaign . Defendant , Heileman Brewing Co.
178. lappuse
CONCLUSION This article has argued that the anti - siphoning rules , as applied to cable pay - TV , violate both the commands of the Communications Act of 1934 , and the first amendment . The legal analysis suggests that the courts ...
CONCLUSION This article has argued that the anti - siphoning rules , as applied to cable pay - TV , violate both the commands of the Communications Act of 1934 , and the first amendment . The legal analysis suggests that the courts ...
371. lappuse
Old Swiss House , Inc. v Anheuser - Busch , Inc. , 569 F. 2d 1130 ( CCPA 1978 ) MUSHROOM As Applied To Shoes Does Not Extend To Women's Sports Wear The Defendant owned the registered trademark MUSHROOMS which it applied to women's shoes ...
Old Swiss House , Inc. v Anheuser - Busch , Inc. , 569 F. 2d 1130 ( CCPA 1978 ) MUSHROOM As Applied To Shoes Does Not Extend To Women's Sports Wear The Defendant owned the registered trademark MUSHROOMS which it applied to women's shoes ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and Other Actions | 23 |
A Problem in | 31 |
Autortiesības | |
7 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action activities actual advertising amendment appearance applied argument association audience authority balance basis broadcast cable pay-TV candidate Citizens claim Comm commercial speech Commission communication concerning considered constitutional consumer Corp D.C. Cir decision Defendant denied determine developed diversity doctrine economic effect existing expression fact fairness Federal format freedom granted hearing held important included individual interest involved issue Justice licensee limited listeners major material means ment newspaper operation opinion person Plaintiff political practices present problem profit prohibited proposed protection published question radio reasonable receive recognized regulation Report result right to know ruled similar standard statement station statute Supp supra note Supreme Court television theory tion trial United violation York