To Amend Section 2 of the Clayton Act, 1. daļaUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary, United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly U.S. Government Printing Office, 1956 - 716 lappuses Considers legislation to revise antitrust laws to encourage competition and prevent price discrimination by large corporations. |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
amendment Arden Association bill buyers Capehart cents CHAFFETZ Chairman CITRIN Clayton Act committee compete competition or tend competitor complete defense Congress cost create a monopoly customers dealers decision Detroit discriminate in price discriminatory price economic effect ELLIS equally low price faith to meet Federal Trade Commission freight absorption gasoline giant manufacturer going good-faith defense ice cream products independent Indiana industry injury to competition June 11 legislation lower price manufacturer MARHOEFER MCGEE meet an equally meeting competition National Ned's offered oil companies Oil Jobbers operate Patman percent Petroleum practices present price discrimination price war proviso question record reduce refiners retail Robinson-Patman Act SEELEY sell seller Senator DIRKSEN Senator KEFAUVER Senator LANGER Sherman Act small business Standard Oil Standard Oil Co statement subcommittee substantially lessen competition substantially to lessen supplier Supreme Court tend to create tion United States Senate wholesale
Populāri fragmenti
49. lappuse - Provided, That nothing herein contained shall prevent discrimination in price between purchasers of commodities on account of differences in the grade, quality, or quantity of the commodity sold, or that makes only due allowance for difference in the cost of selling or transportation, or discrimination in price in the same or different communities made in good faith to meet competition...
216. lappuse - ... case thus made by showing justification shall be upon the person charged with a violation of this section, and unless justification shall be affirmatively shown, the Commission is authorized to issue an order terminating the discrimination...
55. lappuse - Provided, however, That nothing herein contained shall prevent a seller rebutting the prima-facie case thus made by showing that his lower price or the furnishing of services or facilities to any purchaser or purchasers was made in good faith to meet an equally low price of a competitor, or the services or facilities furnished by a competitor.
50. lappuse - It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly, to discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality...
149. lappuse - Act, it is a complete defense to a charge of price discrimination for the seller to show that its price differential has been made in good faith to meet a lawful and equally low price of a competitor.
43. lappuse - It is enough to say that Congress did not seek by the RobinsonPatman Act either to abolish competition or so radically to curtail it that a seller would have no substantial right of self-defense against a price raid by a competitor.
49. lappuse - And provided further, That nothing herein contained shall prevent persons engaged in selling goods, wares, or merchandise in commerce from selecting their own customers in bona fide transactions and not in restraint of trade.
56. lappuse - ... for use, consumption, or resale within the United States or any Territory thereof or the District of Columbia or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States...
169. lappuse - that nothing herein contained shall prevent a seller rebutting the prima facie case [of price discrimination] by showing that his lower price * * * was made in good faith to meet an equally low price of a competitor * * *" * This discussion deals primarily with the scope and application of that "good -faith
498. lappuse - ... prices to all its customers to match the price offered to one, or refusing to meet the competition and then ruinously raising its prices to its remaining customers to cover increased unit costs. There is, on the other hand, plain language and established practice which permits a seller, through section 2 (b), to retain a customer by realistically meeting in good faith the price offered to that customer, without necessarily changing the seller's price to its other customers.