Quality Stabilization, Hearings ..., 87-2 ..., April 9, 19, 23, May 24, 25, 19621962 - 472 lappuses |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
American Antitrust Division antitrust laws Association bait advertising brand name branded products cents chain Chairman commerce committee Congress consumer cost court customers dealers Department of Justice discount houses distribution distributors District of Columbia DIXON drug druggists drugstores economic enactment enforcement established facturer fair trade laws fair trade prices Federal Trade Commission fixed price going independent retailers interest jobber Joint Resolution 159 label legislation LOEVINGER loss leader manufacturer manufacturer's markup merchant MERMEY nationally advertised nonsigner operation outlets percent practices predatory pricing price competition price fixing private brand profit property rights proposed protection purchased Quality Stabilization Act quality stabilization bill resale price maintenance reseller Robinson-Patman Act ROTHWELL sell seller Senate Joint Resolution Senator MONRONEY small business small businessman small retailer sold statement subcommittee suggested retail price sumer testimony thing tion trademark owner trademarked items trademarked product unfair wholesalers
Populāri fragmenti
177. lappuse - ... transactions, under any statute, law, or public policy now or hereafter in effect in any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia in which such resale is to be made, or to which the commodity is to be transported for such resale...
350. lappuse - It is the declared policy of the Congress that the Government should aid, counsel, assist, and protect insofar as is possible the interests of small business concerns in order to preserve free competitive enterprise...
4. lappuse - That any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
309. lappuse - ... /In the absence of any purpose to create or maintain a monopoly, the act does not restrict the long recognized right of trader or manufacturer engaged in an entirely private business, freely to exercise his own independent discretion as to parties with whom he will deal. And, of course, he may announce in advance the circumstances under which he will refuse to sell.
155. lappuse - An Act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraints and monopolies", as amended, commonly known as the Sherman Act (15 USC, Sees.
177. lappuse - That nothing herein contained shall render illegal, contracts or agreements prescribing minimum prices for the resale of a commodity which bears, or the label or container of which bears, the trade mark, brand, or name of the producer or distributor of such commodity and which is in free and open competition with commodities of the same general class produced or distributed by others, when contracts or agreements of that description are lawful as applied...
383. lappuse - When the retailer goes beyond his personal right, and, conspiring and combining with others of like purpose, seeks to obstruct the free course of interstate trade and commerce and to unduly suppress competition by placing obnoxious wholesale dealers under the coercive influence of a condemnatory report circulated among others...
294. lappuse - States for the purpose of destroying competition or eliminating a competitor in such part of the United States; or, to sell, or contract to sell, goods at unreasonably low prices for the purpose of destroying competition or eliminating a competitor.
350. lappuse - For the purposes of this Act, a small-business concern shall be deemed to be one which is independently owned and operated and which is not dominant in its field of operation.
187. lappuse - Unfair methods of competition in commerce, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in commerce, are hereby declared unlawful.