As we shall now go on to the second class, and quote passages where the hand of Shakspeare is not so easily discerned from our authors', if the reader happens to remember neither, it may be entertaining to be left to guess at the different hands. Thus each of them describing a beautiful boy : "Dear lad, believe it, For they shall yet belie thy happy years Is not more smooth and rubious; thy small pipe The other is, "Alas! what kind of grief can thy years know? Thy brows and cheeks are smooth as waters be The one is in Philaster, vol. x. page 169; the other in Twelfth-Night, act i. scene 4.-In the same page of Philaster there is a description of love, which the reader, if he pleases, may compare to two de scriptions of love in As You like It-both by Silvia, but neither preferable to our authors'. I can sage in this play, that seems to deserve the same admiration, is rejected by this great man as not Shakspeare's. The French King, speaking of the Black Prince's victory at Cressy, says, While that his mountain sire, on mountain standing, Mangle the work of nature. Henry V. act ii. scene 4. I have marked the line rejected, and which seems to breathe the full soul of Shakspeare. The reader will find a defence and explanation of the whole passage in a note on Thierry and Theodoret, act IV. scene I. vol. XII.—Seward. not quote half of those which occur in the play of Philaster alone, which bear the same degree of likeness as the last-quoted passages, i. e. where the hands are scarce to be distinguished; but I will give one parallel more from thence, because the passages are both extremely fine, though the hands, from one single expression of Shakspeare's, are more visible; a prince deprived of his throne and betrayed, as he thought, in love, thus mourns his melancholy state: "Oh! that I had been nourish'd in these woods In the other, a king thus compares the state of roy alty to that of a private life : "No, not all these, thrice-gorgeous ceremony, Can sleep so soundly as the wretched slave, Gets him to rest, cramm'd with distressful bread; Juvenal, Sat. vi.-Seward. The instances of these two classes, particularly the former, where the exquisite beauties of Shakspeare are not quite reached, are most numerous and though the design of the notes in this edition was in general only to settle the text, yet in three of the plays, The Faithful Shepherdess, The False One, and The Two Noble Kinsmen, that design is much enlarged, for reasons there assigned. And if the reader pleases to turn to these, he will find several parallels between Fletcher, Shakspeare, and Milton, that are most of them to be ranged under one of these classes: But there is a third class of those instances where our authors have been so happy as to soar above Shakspeare, and even where Shakspeare is not greatly beneath himself. In The Two Gentlemen of Verona, the forlorn Julia, disguised as a boy, being asked of Silvia how tall Julia was, answers, "About my stature; for at Pentecost, When all our pageants of delight were play'd, Act iv. scene the last. There is something extremely tender, innocent, and delicate, in these lines of Shakspeare, but our authors are far beyond this praise in their allusion to the same story. In The Maid's Tragedy, Aspatia, in like manner forsaken by her lover, finds her maid Antiphila working a picture of Ariadne; and, after several fine reflections upon Theseus, says, "But where's the lady? Ant. There, madam. Asp. Fy, you have miss'd it here, Antiphila, As this sad lady's was; do it by me; Do it again by me, the lost Aspatia, And you shall find all true.-Put me on th' wild island. Mine arms thus, and mine hair blown by the wind, Be teachers of my story: do my face (If thou hadst ever feeling of a sorrow) Thus, thus, Antiphila; strive to make me look Vol. xii. p. 51. Whoever has seen either the original or print of Guido's Bacchus and Ariadne will have the best comment on these lines. In both are the arms extended, the hair blown by the wind, the barren roughness of the rocks, the broken trunks of leafless trees, and in both she looks like Sorrow's monument. So that exactly ut pictura poesis; and hard it is to say, whether our authors or Guido painted best. I shall refer to the note below for a farther comment, and proceed to another instance of superior excellence in our authors, and where they have more evidently built on Shakspeare's foundation. At the latter end of King John the King has received a burning poison; and being asked "How fares your majesty? 2 K. John. Poison'd, ill fare! dead, forsook, cast off; As this note contains nothing but a string of very needless emendations on the above speech, and some others in the Maid's Tragedy, it is here omitted." To thrust his icy fingers in my maw; "Nor let my kingdom's rivers take their course The first and last lines are to be ranged among the faults that so much disgrace Shakspeare, which he committed to please the corrupt taste of the age he lived in, but to which Beaumont and Fletcher's learning and fortune made them superior. The intermediate lines are extremely beautiful, and marked as such by the late great editor, but yet are much improved in two plays of our authors, the first in Valentinian, where the Emperor, poisoned in the same manner, dies with more violence, fury, and horror, than King John; but the passage which I shall quote is from a Wife for a Month, a play which does not upon the whole equal the tic sublimity of Valentinian, though it rather excels it in the poisoning scene. The prince Alphonso, who had been long in a phrenzy of melancholy, is poisoned with a hot fiery potion; under the agonies of which he thus raves: "Give me more air, more air, air; blow, blow, blow, Reigns in my blood; oh, which way shall I turn me ? Fling me into the ocean or I perish. Dig, dig, dig, dig, until the springs fly up, The cold, cold springs, that I may leap into them, poe And bathe my scorch'd limbs in their purling pleasures; Or shoot me into the higher region, Where treasures of delicious snow are nourish'd, Rug. Hold him fast, friar, |