Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

For the tax

Against the tax

13. Sylvia Gottlieb, Communications Workers of America (p. 207).

14. Mr. Clifford Patton, National Association of Consumers (p. 211).

15. Mr. Joseph A. Clorety, Jr., American Veterans Committee (p. 215).

EFFECT OF TAX ON PRICES

Weakening or repealing the Federal tax on the sale of colored oleomargarine would result in great damage to dairy farmers and in increasing the cost of oleomargarine to consumers.

1. Charles W. Holman, secretary, National Cooperative Milk Producers Federation (pp. 293, 301).

2. Statement by Representative John Byrnes, Wisconsin, submitted by Representative Reid F. Murray, Wisconsin (p. 348).

"The saving to the American housewife by the elimination of that small tax (4 cent per pound) would be immeasurably small. In fact, the taxes paid on all oleomargarines cut a small figure in the cost of living."

1. Merlin Hull (p. 431).

There will be a shortage of skim milk for the manufacture of oleomargarine if the tax is removed.

1. Representative John Byrnes, Wisconsin (p. 347).

2. Representative Charles R. Robertson, North Dakota (p. 485).

Oleomargarine taxes interfere with most efficient utilization of national re

sources.

1. A. Lee M. Wiggins, Under Secretary of the Treasury (p. 8).

2. Representative New York (p. 104).

Emanuel Celler,

3. Publication by the Department of Commerce of Oleomargarine Studies Initiated by Paul T. Truitt, submitted by Charles W. Holman, secretary, National Cooperative Milk Producers Federation (p. 333).

Oleomargarine taxes raise the price of the product to the consumer, an important item when the cost of living is so high.

1. Representative Brooks Hays, Arkansas (p. 107).

2. Mr. William Rhea Blake, National Cotton Council of America (p. 150). 3. Mr. Edgar C. Corry, Jr., American Veterans of World War II (p. 153). 4. Miss Anna Lord Strauss, League of Women Voters (p. 155).

5. Miss Jean L. Whitehill, Consumers Union (pp. 156-157).

6. Mr. Tyre Taylor, National Association of Retail Grocers (p. 162).

7. Mr. Lewis G. Hines, American Federation of Labor (p. 170).

8. Mr. John H. Hayes, American Hospital Association (p. 183).

9. Mrs. Rena Cohen, National League of Women Shoppers (p. 185).

10. Mrs. E. G. Chamberlain, National Federation of Settlements (p. 191).

11. Mrs. Dennis E. Jackson, Consumers Conference of Greater Cincinnati, Ohio (p. 193).

12. Mrs. Gertrude Parks, District of Columbia Federation of Women's Clubs (p. 197).

13. Representative Robert Nodar, Jr., New York (p. 200).

14. Mr. John N. Hatfield, American Hospital Association (p. 203).

15. Ella H. McNaughton, American Home Economics Association (p. 204).

16. Mrs. Lillian W. Crum, New York City branch, American Association of University Women (p. 205).

17. H. Frances Boyer, National Education Association (p. 210).

18. Mr. Clifford Patton, National Association of Consumers (p. 211).

For the tax

Against the tax

19. Mr. Harvey W. Brown, International Association of Machinists (p 217).

20. Representative Emanuel Celler, New York (p. 104).

21. Representative Olin E. Teague, Texas (p. 482).

22. Mrs. J. Fichtmueller, Jr., League of Women Voters, city of New York (p. 487).

23. Woman's Club of Chevy Chase, Maryland, Inc. (p 488).

EFFECT OF TAX ON PRICES

"If the 10-cent tax on the coloring process were abolished so that oleo could be packaged, handled, and in every other way resemble butter, it is certain that this reduction in the cost of placing colored oleomargarine on the market would not be reflected in the price that the consumer pays for the product."

1. A. B. Tarwater, Plainview (Tex.) Cooperative, Inc. (p. 424).

2. Hugo H. Sommer, professor of dairy industry, University of Wisconsin (p. 406).

"If the color tax is repealed, the white or uncolored product will practically disappear from the market. When this happens, it is only reasonable to assume that oleomargarine can and would be priced only enough under legitimate butter to give it a price appeal."

1. Hassil E. Schenck, Indiana Farm Bureau, Inc. (p. 504).

Repeal of the excise taxes on both colored and uncolored margarine made exclusively from fats and oils of domestic origin probably would result in a price for the colored product about the same as for the uncolored.

1. Charles F. Brannan, Acting Secretary, Department of Agriculture (p. 2).

If Federal laws were changed to remove the 10-cents-per-pound tax which now exists on colored margarine, we would sell colored margarine at the same price as uncolored.

1. Kraft Foods Co., Chicago, Ill. (p. 505).

2. Capital City Products Co, Columbus, Ohio (p. 506).

3. Friedman Manufacturing Co., Chicago, Ill. (p. 506).

4. Kent Products, Inc., Kansas City, Mo. (p. 507).

5. Shedd-Bartush Foods, Inc., Detroit, Mich (p. 509).

6. Durkee Famous Foods, Cleveland, Ohio (p 514).

Any reduction in taxes accruing from the abolition of margarine taxes will be passed on to the consumer.

1. Miami Margarine Co., Cincinnati, Ohio (p. 506).

2. Churngold Corp., Cincinnati, Ohio (p. 508).

3. Wilson & Co., Inc., Chicago, Ill. (p. 509).

4 Mrs. Tucker's Foods, Inc., Sherman, Tex. (p. 510).

5. Vegetable Oil Products Co., Inc., Wilmington, Calif. (p. 511).

6. Standard Brands, Inc., New York, N. Y. (p. 514).

"You need have no concern regarding the possibility of margarine manufacturers trying to make exorbitant profits if the taxes were removed This is a highly competitive business; profit margins have always been very low, and competition will definitely keep them low regardless of any change in the laws."

For the tax

Against the tax

1. H. G. Bergdoll, Kraft Foods Co. (p. 505).

2. David H. Blanton, Jr., The Blanton Co., St. Louis (p. 513).

Use of color

The Federal tax on colored oleomargarine is the consumers' protection against fraudulent sales of oleo as butter.

1. Minnesota Creameries' Association, resolution No. 1 (p. 138).

2. Golden Guernsey Dairy Cooperative, statement submitted by Charles W. Holman, secretary, Cooperative Milk Producers Federation (p. 283).

3. "Colored Oleo Sold as Butter," National Cooperative Milk Producers Federation, submitted by Charles W. Holman (p. 285).

4. Charles W. Holman (pp. 294, 295, 328).

5. H. W. Curtiss, Illinois Agricultural Association (p. 421).

6. Statement by Representative John Byrnes, Wisconsin, submitted by Representative Reid F. Murray, Wisconsin (p. 347).

7. Statement by Mrs. Stella E. Barker, Des Moines, Iowa (pp. 355, 358). 8. Kenzie S. Bagshaw, chairman, excutive committee, the National Grange (pp. 374-375).

9. Representative Charles R. Robertson, North Dakota (p. 485).

10. Harley J. Credicott president, Freeport Dairy Products Co. (p. 383). 11. Leonard E. Kopitzke Marion, Wis., president of the Wisconsin Cheese Makers Association (p. 401).

12. Hugo H. Sommer, professor of dairy industry, University of Wisconsin (p. 407).

The only way oleomargarine can be made yellow is by coloring it. Natural oleo ends up in some shade other than yellow.

1. Statement by Representative John Byrnes, Wisconsin, submitted by Representative Reid F. Murray, Wisconsin (p. 347).

2. Statement by Wilson F. Douglass, director of laboratories, Cudahy Packing Co. (p. 303).

3. Harley J. Credicott, president, Freeport Dairy Products Co. (p. 383).

"The butter industry adopted the natural color of their product which during the lush grass season is yellow. To make it uniform the year round, coloring is added, at certain other seasons, to maintain this same yellow."

Consumers prefer a yellow spread because it is more appetizing than a white one. When butter is not yellow, color is added. Similarly, coloring of oleomargarine should be allowed without penalty.

1. Mr. A. Lee M. Wiggins, Under Secretary of the Treasury (p. 12).

Representative W. R. Poage, Texas (p. 27).

2. Mr. J. D. Henderson, American Association of Small Business (p. 123). 3. Mr. Ersel Walley, president, American Soybean Association (p. 127).

4. Mr. John W. Evans, American Soybean Association (p. 130).

5. Mr. Howard Roach, American Soybean Association (p. 133).

6. Mr. George M. Strayer, American Soybean Association (p. 135).

7. Mr. William Rhea Blake, National Cotton Council of America (p. 151). 8. Mr. Edgar C. Corry, Jr., American Veterans of World War II (p. 153). 9. Miss Jean L. Whitehill, Consumers Union (pp. 156-157).

10. Mrs. Dennis E. Jackson, Consumers Conference of Greater Cincinnati, Ohio (p. 194).

11. Senator Burnet R. Maybank, South Carolina (p. 201).

12. Mr. John N. Hatfield, American Hospital Association (p. 203).

13. Sylvia B. Gottlieb, Communications Workers of America (p. 205).

14. Mr. J. Roy Jones, commissioner of agriculture, South Carolina (p. 209).

For the tax

Against the tax

1. Hassil E. Schenck, Indiana Farm Bureau, Inc. (p. 504).

2. Hugo H. Sommer, professor of dairy industry, University of Wisconsin (p. 409).

3. Harley J. Credicott, president, Freeport Dairy Products Co. (p. 383).

4. Charles W. Holman, secretary, National Cooperative Milk Producers Federation (p. 327).

Without internal revenue regulation the sale of colored oleomargarine as real butter would most likely increase almost overnight.

1. Colored Oleo Sold as Butter, National Cooperative Milk Producers Federations, submitted by Charles W. Holman, secretary, National Cooperative Milk Producers Federation (p. 292).

PROTECTION OF DEALERS IN OLEOMARGARINE

In 1933 there were 102 retail dealers handling colored oleomargarine and in 1947 there were 5,102. In 1933, there were 103,501 who handled uncolored oleomargarine and in 1947 there were 265,984. I would be forced to conclude from this remarkable growth of handlers in that period that not only is it profitable for these dealers to handle the product or otherwise they would not pay the taxes, but that approximately one retail handler of food out of every two in the United States makes oleomargarine available in some form or another to the customers, so there cannot be a scarcity of retail dealers when over one-half of them in the United States are handling the product.

1. Charles W. Holman, National Cooperative Milk Producers Federation (p. 326).

"At present oleomargarine is readily available, as witness results of a study recently announced that more than 80 percent of the Nation's families are using oleomargarine."

Dealers in oleomargarine must pay burdensome license fees. There is also a mass of highly technical regulations and requirements which grocers must follow.

1. Tyre Taylor, National Association of Retail Grocers (pp. 162–163).

2. Edgar C. Corry, Jr., American Veterans of World War II (p. 154).

3. L. T. Newman, United States Wholesale Grocers' Association (p. 166). License fees on handling of oleomargarine favor larger firms over smaller

ones.

1. Edgar C. Corry, Jr., American Veterans of World War II (p. 154).

2. Donald Montgomery, Congress of Industrial Organizations (p. 182).

License fees on handling of oleomargarine are discriminatory because small grocers cannot afford them and so do not carry the product.

1. Mrs. Florence Geiger, National Council of Jewish Women (p. 189). 2. Margaret F. Stone, National Women's Trade-Union League of America

1. Mrs. Stella E. Barker, Des Moines, (p. 190). Iowa (p. 356).

3. Mrs. E. G. Chamberlain, National Federation of Settlements (p. 191).

4. Ella H. McNaughton, American Home Economics Association (p. 205). 5. Clifford Patton, National Association of Consumers (p. 212).

6. Lewis G. Hines, American Federation of Labor (p. 171).

7. Representative John L. McMillan, South Carolina (p. 382).

8. Benjamin C. Marsh, People's Lobby (p. 487).

76269-40

PROTECTION OF PRODUCERS

For the tax Removal of oleomargarine taxes would weaken butter prices and jeopardize the dairy industry.

1. Representative Reid F. Murray, Wisconsin (pp. 13, 34).

2. Charles W .Holman, secretary, National Cooperative Milk Producers Federation (pp. 293-5, 301).

"We say, 'Let the public eat all the oleomargarine it wants.' That is fair competition. But we think the removal of the color laws would establish unfair competition for the dairy farmer."

1. Charles W. Holman (p. 343).

Ninety percent of the milk leaves the farms in fluid form but what it goes into depends upon the markets.

1. Representative Reid Murray, Wisconsin (p. 32).

Against the tax

Oleomargarine taxes are discriminatory and tend to distort the competitive position of two domestic industries. 1. A. Lee M. Wiggins, Under Secretary of the Treasury (p. 8).

2. Representative W. R. Poage, Texas (pp. 27, 28, 31, 35).

3. Representative Stephen Pace, Georgia (p. 14).

4. Representative L. Mendel Rivers, South Carolina (p. 38).

5. Mr. Clark W. Patton, American Association of Small Business (p. 124). 6. Representative Omar Burleson,

[blocks in formation]

8. Representative Ellsworth B. Foote, Connecticut (p. 105).

9. Mr. William Rhea Blake, National Cotton Council of America (p. 150).

10. Representative Brooks Hays, Arkansas (p. 107).

11. Mr. Tyre Taylor, National Association of Retail Grocers (p. 164).

12. Mrs. Rena Cohen, National League of Women Shoppers (p. 187).

13. Mrs. Florence Geiger, National Council of Jewish Women (p. 188).

14. Margaret F. Stone, National Women's Trade-Union League of America (p. 190).

15. Mrs. Dennis E. Jackson, Consumers Conference of Greater Cincinnati, Ohio (p. 193).

16. Representative Robert Nodar, Jr., New York (p. 200).

17. Sylvia B. Gottlieb, Communications Workers of America (p. 209).

18. Mr. J. Roy Jones, Commissioner of Agriculture, South Carolina (p. 208). 19. Mr. Joseph A. Clorety, Jr., American Veterans Committee (p. 215).

20. American Association of University Women, Washington, D. C. (p. 486). 21. Mrs. J. Fichtmueller, Jr., League of Women Voters, city of New York (p. 487).

22. Woman's Club of Chevy Chase, Md. (p. 488).

23. American Association of University Women, Wisconsin division (p. 490).

The dairy farmer receives more for his product when its ultimate use is as fluid milk rather than as butter. Removal of oleomargarine taxes would. result in a greater percentage of milk produced being used ultimately in fluid rather than in butter form.

1. Representative W. R. Poage, Texas (p. 29).

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »