Trust Management: Third International Conference, ITrust 2005, Paris, France, May 23-26, 2005, Proceedings, 3. sējumsSpringer Science & Business Media, 2005. gada 12. maijs - 426 lappuses This volume constitutes the proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Trust Management, held in Paris, France, during 2326 May 2005. The conf- ence follows successful International Conferences in Crete in 2003 and Oxford in 2004. All conferences were organized by iTrust, which is a working group funded as a thematic network by the Future and Emerging Technologies (FET) unit of the Information Society Technologies (IST) program of the European Union. The purpose of the iTrust working group is to provide a forum for cro- disciplinary investigation of the applications of trust as a means of increasing security, building con?dence and facilitating collaboration in dynamic open s- tems. The notion of trust has been studied independently by di?erent academic disciplines, which has helped us to identify and understand di?erent aspects of trust. Theaimofthisconferencewastoprovideacommonforum,bringingtogether researchers from di?erent academic branches, such as the technology-oriented disciplines, law, social sciences and philosophy, in order to develop a deeper and more fundamental understanding of the issues and challenges in the area of trust management in dynamic open systems. The response to this conference was excellent; from the 71 papers submitted to the conference, we selected 21 full papers and 4 short papers for presentation. The program also included two keynote addresses, given by Steve Marsh from National Research Centre Canada, Institute for Information Technology, and Steve Kimbrough from the University of Pennsylvania; an industrial panel; 7 technology demonstrations; and a full day of tutorials. |
Saturs
Third International Conference on Trust | 1 |
Trust Untrust Distrust and Mistrust An Exploration of the Darker | 17 |
Full Papers | 34 |
Specifying Legal Risk Scenarios Using the CORAS Threat Modelling | 45 |
On Deciding to Trust | 61 |
Trust Management Survey | 77 |
Can We Manage Trust? | 93 |
Operational Models for Reputation Servers | 108 |
Enabling Effective Resource Selection in | 240 |
Interactive Credential Negotiation for Stateful Business Processes | 256 |
An Evidence Based Architecture for Efficient AttackResistant | 273 |
Towards an Evaluation Methodology for Computational Trust Systems | 289 |
Strengths Weaknesses and Further Opportunities | 305 |
Encouraging Selfrecommendations Without Sybil | 321 |
PrivacyPreserving Search and Updates for Outsourced TreeStructured | 338 |
Short Papers | 355 |
A Representation Model of Trust Relationships with Delegation | 116 |
Affect and Trust | 131 |
A Formal Investigation of Moral Facilitation | 146 |
Modeling Social and Individual Trust in Requirements Engineering | 161 |
Towards a Generic Trust Model Comparison of Various Trust Update | 177 |
A Probabilistic Trust Model for Handling Inaccurate Reputation Sources | 193 |
Trust as a Key to Improving Recommendation Systems | 210 |
Alleviating the Sparsity Problem of Collaborative Filtering Using Trust | 224 |
Combining Trust and Risk to Reduce the Cost of Attacks | 372 |
Demonstration Overviews | 393 |
Christos Nikolaou University of Crete Greece | 402 |
Towards a Grid Platform Enabling Dynamic Virtual Organisations | 406 |
Multimedia Copyright Protection Platform Demonstrator | 411 |
The VoteSecureTM Secure Internet Voting System | 420 |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Trust Management: Third International Conference, ITrust 2005 ..., 3. sējums Peter Herrmann Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2005 |
Trust Management: Third International Conference, iTrust 2005, Paris, France ... Peter Herrmann,Valerie Issarny,Simon Shiu Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2005 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action actor agents algorithm allows analysis answering application approach associated attack authorization behaviour calculated client computing concept Conference considered context cost credentials CURRENT decision define depends described different discussed distributed distrust entity environment evaluation evidence example existing expected experiences forgiveness framework function give given identity important increase individual initial integrity interactions International issues Italy language means measure mechanisms method negative node observations operations opinion outcomes particular path perform platform play positive possible presented principal problem Proceedings proposed protection ratings reason recommendations References relationships reliable represents reputation reputation systems request requirements resource risk role scenario selection server shows similar situation social solution trust management trust value trustworthiness University update