Reports of the Tax Court of the United States, 95. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1991 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
2. lappuse
... parties , we questioned whether we had jurisdiction to determine an individual shareholder's basis in a subchapter S corporation in a proceeding at the corporate level . We held two separate hearings on this matter . Respondent ...
... parties , we questioned whether we had jurisdiction to determine an individual shareholder's basis in a subchapter S corporation in a proceeding at the corporate level . We held two separate hearings on this matter . Respondent ...
6. lappuse
... parties from relitigating any issue already resolved in the partnership proceeding , for example , the value of basis of partnership assets . We cannot , of course , take jurisdiction except where the statute mandates it . Maxwell v ...
... parties from relitigating any issue already resolved in the partnership proceeding , for example , the value of basis of partnership assets . We cannot , of course , take jurisdiction except where the statute mandates it . Maxwell v ...
7. lappuse
... parties disagreed about whether a partner's sec . 465 at risk limitation was a " partnership item . " 1Cases of the following petitioners are consolidated herewith : Garnac Grain Export Corp. , Dissolved , docket No. 8213-86 ; Garnac ...
... parties disagreed about whether a partner's sec . 465 at risk limitation was a " partnership item . " 1Cases of the following petitioners are consolidated herewith : Garnac Grain Export Corp. , Dissolved , docket No. 8213-86 ; Garnac ...
33. lappuse
... parties have stipulated that the crops grown on Garnac's lands were sold to domestic third parties and that Garnac has no documents concerning the use or further disposition of the grain by these third parties . Garnac has not met the ...
... parties have stipulated that the crops grown on Garnac's lands were sold to domestic third parties and that Garnac has no documents concerning the use or further disposition of the grain by these third parties . Garnac has not met the ...
35. lappuse
... parties , Decisions will be entered under Rule 155 . SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION , IN ITS OWN BEHALF AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO FIRST SURETY CORPORATION AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES , AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SAVINGS ...
... parties , Decisions will be entered under Rule 155 . SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION , IN ITS OWN BEHALF AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO FIRST SURETY CORPORATION AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES , AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SAVINGS ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
9th Cir additions to tax adjustments affd allocation amended Amesbury amount apply assessment assets attributable Ballard Equity cable television Calumet carryback cattle Chunchula claimed CNMI Commis compensation computed Congress contends corporation decedent decedent's dismiss for lack employee estate tax excise tax facts Federal feedlot FPAA franchise Garnac grain Guam included Income Tax Regs interest Internal Revenue Code Internal Revenue Service investment issue lease legislative history limited loan marital deduction Matherne maximum marital deduction meaning of section motion to dismiss notice of deficiency opinion paid parties partnership items payments percent period person petitioner petitioner's prior provides purposes pursuant recapture agreement regulations Rept respect Respondent determined rule shareholders sioner spouse Stabiflex statute statute of limitations statutory stipulated subchapter subsidiary supra T.C. Memo Tax Court tax liability tax matters partner taxable income taxpayer tion Trust U.S. Steel United valuation Wallace WROG
Populāri fragmenti
626. lappuse - Except when notice or hearing is required by statute, this subsection does not apply: (A) to interpretative rules, general statements of policy, or rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice...
272. lappuse - Except as provided in section 276 — (a) GENERAL RULE. — The amount of income taxes imposed by this title shall be assessed within three years after the return was filed, and no proceeding in court without assessment for the collection of such taxes shall be begun after the expiration of such period.
46. lappuse - Congress — but the power to adopt regulations to carry into effect the will of Congress as expressed by the statute. A regulation which does not do this, but operates to create a rule out of harmony with the statute, is a mere nullity.
34. lappuse - ... upon such basis as the Commissioner, with the approval of the Secretary, may prescribe as conforming as nearly as may be to the best accounting practice in the trade or business and as most clearly reflecting the income.
160. lappuse - Structure" means that which is built or constructed, an edifice or building of any kind, or any piece of work artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner.
253. lappuse - Any such liability may be either as to the amount of tax shown on the return or as to any deficiency In tax.
590. lappuse - Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Political Union with the United States of America...
346. lappuse - Whoever makes or presents to any person or officer in the civil; military, or naval service of the United States, or to any department or agency thereof, any claim upon or against the United States, or any department or agency thereof, knowing such claim to be false,. fictitious, or fraudulent, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
554. lappuse - An ostensible salary paid by a corporation may be a distribution of a dividend on stock. This is likely to occur in the case of a corporation having few shareholders, practically all of whom draw salaries. If in such a case the salaries are in excess of those ordinarily paid for similar services and the excessive payments correspond or bear a close relationship to the stockholdings of the officers or employees, it would seem likely that the salaries are not paid wholly for services rendered, but...
121. lappuse - Division 5 of this code shall be liberally construed by the courts with the purpose of extending their benefits for the protection of persons injured in the course of their employment.