No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 42.
61. lappuse
TRIAL OF AN INTERFERENCE PROCEEDING Testimony ; Time ; Burden of Proof The taking of testimony in interference proceedings is governed by 35 U.S.C. 23 , 24 which take the place of Secs . 4905-4908 , incl . , R.S. , and by Rules 251-259 ...
TRIAL OF AN INTERFERENCE PROCEEDING Testimony ; Time ; Burden of Proof The taking of testimony in interference proceedings is governed by 35 U.S.C. 23 , 24 which take the place of Secs . 4905-4908 , incl . , R.S. , and by Rules 251-259 ...
65. lappuse
An applicant cannot establish the requisite facts by his testimony alone . And his notes of themselves do not suffice . Credible oral testimony of other persons will do . But it must be factually specific.3 The evidence should ...
An applicant cannot establish the requisite facts by his testimony alone . And his notes of themselves do not suffice . Credible oral testimony of other persons will do . But it must be factually specific.3 The evidence should ...
78. lappuse
Official records and printed publications , and testimony 1966 ) , affirming denial of motion under Sec . 24 , deeming subpoena too broad . Re subpoena in foreign country , see 28 USC 1783 , 1784 . In Ochsner v .
Official records and printed publications , and testimony 1966 ) , affirming denial of motion under Sec . 24 , deeming subpoena too broad . Re subpoena in foreign country , see 28 USC 1783 , 1784 . In Ochsner v .
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | iii |
Introduction | lvi |
The principal steps in an interference proceeding | 4 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
52 CCPA abandonment action affidavits amendment appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board Brenner burden CADC claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosure dissolve distinguished effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing date final hearing ground held infra inter interference interpretation inventor involving JPOS judgment Junior jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner prior priority of invention procedure proceedings proof proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relation Request requisites res adjudicata respect senior party specification steps subject matter Supp supra taking Term testimony tion United USPQ